From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC827C433DF for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 17:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9149220738 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 17:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="CPbywPXp" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9149220738 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB9F89C8F; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 17:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ej1-x629.google.com (mail-ej1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::629]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37D1D89C8F for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 17:56:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ej1-x629.google.com with SMTP id d6so22493524ejr.5 for ; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 10:56:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fjO5Z/awq5OwVYAW8J793weghGKF6Dcf3RqAnSVh91c=; b=CPbywPXpyVowY0H1csLTRYEu5RiYCdy0BRciiIzAcvxU99oxh2C1zfAw5Jprgtm8lG 5A8zyOxyq/D/15fYzbhOJSX84Jxk229aR0/k9HvbxySLKKkFmB3MihDmEGVuGpUE5EmB 74QxCV2Pda0AT1/x35LK1Vs9R9fG+1eAdkiULjE5bZnUFxgL9brxJV+2/cRfkf2JhmUt TapfWAk9LfpH3QD8BiiRKxasVJSKrNv4S5rKE8NbmK+oVDSbSCmgPsKNL+O3NDnSNkmo CZIsT9ggYkiRP0i1V97qitFqqXcqUdt5JD/VVhpVyQGyKb0EBHAOyiMGw5zopbCMyT+O pF0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fjO5Z/awq5OwVYAW8J793weghGKF6Dcf3RqAnSVh91c=; b=nxpB9liEgrgZgiva9AVmQyKD8h/zoaxwADbJSdT01IJogCgMZ8W6Df8KOaD1wsL06J XLhD2bDm5t663LzgBPZYd3GDoyC5/loFfJYPliPn1/sU8BUUXLjBdGaGj50ULdG98dDo GWDXTyrnol9l40Ra60mZa16oDRrZbJXUslGSW2mUF2lFpkKEAHL4rjulvSSAGzRYH7+u xotIHF4YQ14aO+tw0SN7UyF+0kvGWz9vFN6UKwksJF/Y/RLrjZdA5r+Z/2nCBSaw6voO hiKDhbKkvzHzkKtyPvY83z3r/aA1imApDzGsLLzgX9iyBYodC12Rj4i46Xsjdye4do3M Ruzg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531pq8ST/7Fh40vqfvADjyvx02SY75pb5EjZsC0en7DIrOuoqJM4 RUrYket8j4WwovWBey+Z0xbQuClfjSK+1GlIb8MnAA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxVH/o7Lvt48L80wD6vaoqe16TgPe2rAbxBDXwbrAR8hUdMCKD8h+Y1Zgrf2WfWjYZ2vwla7owSAnsuGLhvoek= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:13d8:: with SMTP id g24mr12847809ejc.317.1596391015692; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 10:56:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200802164412.2738-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20200802164412.2738-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> From: Dave Airlie Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 03:56:44 +1000 Message-ID: To: Chris Wilson Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] Time, where did it go? X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Intel Graphics Development Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 02:44, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Lots of small incremental improvements to reduce execution latency > which basically offsets the small regressions incurred when compared to > 5.7. And then there are some major fixes found while staring agape at > lockstat. What introduced the 5.7 regressions? are they documented somewhere. What is the goal here, is there a benchmark or application that this benefits that you can quantify the benefits? Is the lack of userspace command submission a problem vs other vendors here? Dave. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx