Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC][PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/display: Add Nearest-neighbor based integer scaling support

["Laxminarayan Bharadiya, Pankaj" <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Sent: 12 March 2020 19:25
> To: Laxminarayan Bharadiya, Pankaj
> <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>
> Cc: jani.nikula@linux.intel.com; daniel@ffwll.ch; intel-
> gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; airlied@linux.ie;
> maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com; tzimmermann@suse.de;
> mripard@kernel.org; mihail.atanassov@arm.com; Joonas Lahtinen
> <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>; Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>;
> Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>; Souza, Jose <jose.souza@intel.com>;
> De Marchi, Lucas <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>; Roper, Matthew D
> <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>; Deak, Imre <imre.deak@intel.com>; Shankar,
> Uma <uma.shankar@intel.com>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Nautiyal, Ankit K
> <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/display: Add Nearest-neighbor based
> integer scaling support
> 
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 09:13:24AM +0000, Laxminarayan Bharadiya, Pankaj
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > Sent: 10 March 2020 21:47
> > > To: Laxminarayan Bharadiya, Pankaj
> > > <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>
> > > Cc: jani.nikula@linux.intel.com; daniel@ffwll.ch; intel-
> > > gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org;
> > > airlied@linux.ie; maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com;
> > > tzimmermann@suse.de; mripard@kernel.org; mihail.atanassov@arm.com;
> > > Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>; Vivi, Rodrigo
> > > <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>; Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>;
> > > Souza, Jose <jose.souza@intel.com>; De Marchi, Lucas
> > > <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>; Roper, Matthew D
> > > <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>; Deak, Imre <imre.deak@intel.com>;
> > > Shankar, Uma <uma.shankar@intel.com>; linux- kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > > Nautiyal, Ankit K <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/display: Add Nearest-neighbor
> > > based integer scaling support
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 12:35:45PM +0530, Pankaj Bharadiya wrote:
> > > > Integer scaling (IS) is a nearest-neighbor upscaling technique
> > > > that simply scales up the existing pixels by an integer (i.e.,
> > > > whole
> > > > number) multiplier.Nearest-neighbor (NN) interpolation works by
> > > > filling in the missing color values in the upscaled image with
> > > > that of the coordinate-mapped nearest source pixel value.
> > > >
> > > > Both IS and NN preserve the clarity of the original image. Integer
> > > > scaling is particularly useful for pixel art games that rely on
> > > > sharp, blocky images to deliver their distinctive look.
> > > >
> > > > Program the scaler filter coefficients to enable the NN filter if
> > > > scaling filter property is set to
> > > > DRM_SCALING_FILTER_NEAREST_NEIGHBOR
> > > > and enable integer scaling.
> > > >
> > > > Bspec: 49247
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya
> > > > <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 83
> > > > +++++++++++++++++++-  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> > > > +++++++++++++++++++|
> > > > 2 +  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c  | 20 +++--
> > > >  3 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > > index b5903ef3c5a0..6d5f59203258 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > > @@ -6237,6 +6237,73 @@ void skl_scaler_disable(const struct
> > > intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state)
> > > >  		skl_detach_scaler(crtc, i);
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > +/**
> > > > + *  Theory behind setting nearest-neighbor integer scaling:
> > > > + *
> > > > + *  17 phase of 7 taps requires 119 coefficients in 60 dwords per set.
> > > > + *  The letter represents the filter tap (D is the center tap)
> > > > +and the number
> > > > + *  represents the coefficient set for a phase (0-16).
> > > > + *
> > > > + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> > > > + *         |Index value | Data value coeffient 1 | Data value coeffient 2 |
> > > > + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> > > > + *         |   00h      |          B0            |          A0            |
> > > > + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> > > > + *         |   01h      |          D0            |          C0            |
> > > > + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> > > > + *         |   02h      |          F0            |          E0            |
> > > > + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> > > > + *         |   03h      |          A1            |          G0            |
> > > > + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> > > > + *         |   04h      |          C1            |          B1            |
> > > > + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> > > > + *         |   ...      |          ...           |          ...           |
> > > > + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> > > > + *         |   38h      |          B16           |          A16           |
> > > > + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> > > > + *         |   39h      |          D16           |          C16           |
> > > > + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> > > > + *         |   3Ah      |          F16           |          C16           |
> > > > + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> > > > + *         |   3Bh      |        Reserved        |          G16           |
> > > > + *         +------------+------------------------+------------------------+
> > > > + *
> > > > + *  To enable nearest-neighbor scaling:  program scaler
> > > > +coefficents with
> > > > + *  the center tap (Dxx) values set to 1 and all other values set
> > > > +to
> > > > +0 as per
> > > > + *  SCALER_COEFFICIENT_FORMAT
> > > > + *
> > > > + */
> > > > +void skl_setup_nearest_neighbor_filter(struct drm_i915_private
> > > *dev_priv,
> > > > +				  enum pipe pipe, int scaler_id)
> > >
> > > skl_scaler_...
> > >
> > > > +{
> > > > +
> > > > +	int coeff = 0;
> > > > +	int phase = 0;
> > > > +	int tap;
> > > > +	int val = 0;
> > >
> > > Needlessly wide scope for most of these.
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > +	/*enable the index auto increment.*/
> > > > +	intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, SKL_PS_COEF_INDEX_SET0(pipe,
> > > scaler_id),
> > > > +			  _PS_COEE_INDEX_AUTO_INC);
> > > > +
> > > > +	for (phase = 0; phase < 17; phase++) {
> > > > +		for (tap = 0; tap < 7; tap++) {
> > > > +			coeff++;
> > >
> > > Can be part of the % check.
> >
> > OK.
> >
> > >
> > > > +			if (tap == 3)
> > > > +				val = (phase % 2) ? (0x800) : (0x800 << 16);
> > >
> > > Parens overload.
> >
> > OK. Will remove.
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > +			if (coeff % 2 == 0) {
> > > > +				intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv,
> > > SKL_PS_COEF_DATA_SET0(pipe, scaler_id), val);
> > > > +				val = 0;
> > >
> > > Can drop this val=0 if you move the variable into tight scope and
> > > initialize there.
> >
> > Moving val=0 initialization to the tight scope will not work here as
> > we need to retain "val" and write only when 2 coefficients are ready
> > (since 2 coefficients are packed in 1 dword).
> >
> > e.g. for (12th , 11th)  coefficients, coefficient reg value should be ( (0 << 16) |
> 0x800).
> > If we initialize val = 0 in tight loop, 0 will be written to  coefficient register.
> 
> Hmm, right. I guess I'd try to rearrange this to iterate the registers directly
> instead of the phases and taps. Something like this perhaps:
> 
> static int cnl_coef_tap(int i)
> {
> 	return i % 7;
> }
> 
> static u16 cnl_coef(int t)

cnl_coef -> cnl_nearest_filter_coef.  Right?

> {
> 	return t == 3 ? 0x0800 : 0x3000;
> }
> 
> static void cnl_program_nearest_filter_coefs(void)
> {
> 	int i;
> 
> 	for (i = 0; i < 17 * 7; i += 2) {
> 		uint32_t tmp;
> 		int t;
> 
> 		t = cnl_coef_tap(i);
> 		tmp = cnl_nearest_filter_coef(t);
> 
> 		t = cnl_coef_tap(i + 1);
> 		tmp |= cnl_nearest_filter_coef(t) << 16;
> 
> 		intel_de_write_fw(tmp);
> 	}
> }
> 
> More readable I think. The downside being all those modulo operations but
> hopefully that's all in the noise when it comes to performance.

Looks better, thanks for spending time on this.
I will try this out.

Thanks,
Pankaj 
> 
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx