From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/30] drm/i915: finish removal of CNL
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 06:21:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YP6MpaAGIkH81MnH@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210724001114.249295-27-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 05:11:10PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> With all the users removed, finish removing the CNL platform definitions.
> We will leave the PCI IDs around as those are exposed to userspace.
> Even if mesa doesn't support CNL anymore, let's avoid build breakages
> due to changing the headers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 7 +------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 23 +++++------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 2 --
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h | 2 --
> 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index dd2d196050d4..e3c8283d770c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1437,7 +1437,6 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> #define IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_GEMINILAKE)
> #define IS_COFFEELAKE(dev_priv) IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_COFFEELAKE)
> #define IS_COMETLAKE(dev_priv) IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_COMETLAKE)
> -#define IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_CANNONLAKE)
> #define IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv) IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_ICELAKE)
> #define IS_JSL_EHL(dev_priv) (IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_JASPERLAKE) || \
> IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_ELKHARTLAKE))
> @@ -1503,8 +1502,6 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> #define IS_CML_GT2(dev_priv) (IS_COMETLAKE(dev_priv) && \
> INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gt == 2)
>
> -#define IS_CNL_WITH_PORT_F(dev_priv) \
> - IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_CANNONLAKE, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_PORTF)
> #define IS_ICL_WITH_PORT_F(dev_priv) \
> IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_ICELAKE, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_PORTF)
>
> @@ -1649,9 +1646,7 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>
> /* WaRsDisableCoarsePowerGating:skl,cnl */
> #define NEEDS_WaRsDisableCoarsePowerGating(dev_priv) \
> - (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || \
> - IS_SKL_GT3(dev_priv) || \
> - IS_SKL_GT4(dev_priv))
> + (IS_SKL_GT3(dev_priv) || IS_SKL_GT4(dev_priv))
>
> #define HAS_GMBUS_IRQ(dev_priv) (GRAPHICS_VER(dev_priv) >= 4)
> #define HAS_GMBUS_BURST_READ(dev_priv) (GRAPHICS_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 || \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> index 48ea23dd3b5b..aea2c2d82fbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> @@ -787,27 +787,13 @@ static const struct intel_device_info cml_gt2_info = {
> .gt = 2,
> };
>
> -#define GEN10_FEATURES \
> - GEN9_FEATURES, \
> - GEN(10), \
> - .dbuf.size = 1024 - 4, /* 4 blocks for bypass path allocation */ \
> - .display.has_dsc = 1, \
> - .has_coherent_ggtt = false, \
> - GLK_COLORS
> -
> -static const struct intel_device_info cnl_info = {
> - GEN10_FEATURES,
> - PLATFORM(INTEL_CANNONLAKE),
> - .gt = 2,
> -};
> -
> #define GEN11_DEFAULT_PAGE_SIZES \
> .page_sizes = I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_4K | \
> I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_64K | \
> I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_2M
>
> #define GEN11_FEATURES \
> - GEN10_FEATURES, \
> + GEN9_FEATURES, \
> GEN11_DEFAULT_PAGE_SIZES, \
> .abox_mask = BIT(0), \
> .cpu_transcoder_mask = BIT(TRANSCODER_A) | BIT(TRANSCODER_B) | \
> @@ -830,10 +816,12 @@ static const struct intel_device_info cnl_info = {
> [TRANSCODER_DSI_1] = TRANSCODER_DSI1_OFFSET, \
> }, \
> GEN(11), \
> + .color = { .degamma_lut_size = 33, .gamma_lut_size = 262145 }, \
> .dbuf.size = 2048, \
> .dbuf.slice_mask = BIT(DBUF_S1) | BIT(DBUF_S2), \
> - .has_logical_ring_elsq = 1, \
> - .color = { .degamma_lut_size = 33, .gamma_lut_size = 262145 }
> + .display.has_dsc = 1, \
> + .has_coherent_ggtt = false, \
> + .has_logical_ring_elsq = 1
>
> static const struct intel_device_info icl_info = {
> GEN11_FEATURES,
> @@ -1123,7 +1111,6 @@ static const struct pci_device_id pciidlist[] = {
> INTEL_CML_GT2_IDS(&cml_gt2_info),
> INTEL_CML_U_GT1_IDS(&cml_gt1_info),
> INTEL_CML_U_GT2_IDS(&cml_gt2_info),
> - INTEL_CNL_IDS(&cnl_info),
> INTEL_ICL_11_IDS(&icl_info),
> INTEL_EHL_IDS(&ehl_info),
> INTEL_JSL_IDS(&jsl_info),
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> index 838cc14c2f24..108774d651d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> @@ -4319,7 +4319,6 @@ static void oa_init_supported_formats(struct i915_perf *perf)
> case INTEL_GEMINILAKE:
> case INTEL_COFFEELAKE:
> case INTEL_COMETLAKE:
> - case INTEL_CANNONLAKE:
> case INTEL_ICELAKE:
> case INTEL_ELKHARTLAKE:
> case INTEL_JASPERLAKE:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> index 99b51c292942..2893a8659a8b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> @@ -59,7 +59,6 @@ static const char * const platform_names[] = {
> PLATFORM_NAME(GEMINILAKE),
> PLATFORM_NAME(COFFEELAKE),
> PLATFORM_NAME(COMETLAKE),
> - PLATFORM_NAME(CANNONLAKE),
> PLATFORM_NAME(ICELAKE),
> PLATFORM_NAME(ELKHARTLAKE),
> PLATFORM_NAME(JASPERLAKE),
> @@ -175,7 +174,6 @@ static const u16 subplatform_ulx_ids[] = {
> };
>
> static const u16 subplatform_portf_ids[] = {
> - INTEL_CNL_PORT_F_IDS(0),
> INTEL_ICL_PORT_F_IDS(0),
> };
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> index 616ccec41d76..057c9aa6f9c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> @@ -76,8 +76,6 @@ enum intel_platform {
> INTEL_GEMINILAKE,
> INTEL_COFFEELAKE,
> INTEL_COMETLAKE,
> - /* gen10 */
> - INTEL_CANNONLAKE,
> /* gen11 */
> INTEL_ICELAKE,
> INTEL_ELKHARTLAKE,
> --
> 2.31.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-26 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-24 0:10 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/30] Remove CNL support Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-24 0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/30] drm/i915: fix not reading DSC disable fuse in GLK Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-24 18:03 ` Matt Roper
2021-07-24 0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/30] drm/i915/display: split DISPLAY_VER 9 and 10 in intel_setup_outputs() Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-24 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-25 5:02 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:20 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-26 14:01 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-24 0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/30] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-24 18:05 ` Matt Roper
2021-07-24 0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/30] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_cdclk.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-24 18:12 ` Matt Roper
2021-07-27 6:12 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-24 0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/30] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_color.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-24 18:14 ` Matt Roper
2021-07-24 0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/30] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_combo_phy.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-24 18:17 ` Matt Roper
2021-07-24 0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/30] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_crtc.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-24 18:17 ` Matt Roper
2021-07-24 0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/30] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_ddi.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 11:00 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24 0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/30] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_debugfs.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 11:06 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24 0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/30] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dmc.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 11:06 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-26 23:21 ` Matt Roper
2021-07-24 0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/30] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dp.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:41 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24 0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/30] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dpll_mgr.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:35 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24 0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/30] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_vdsc.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 11:05 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24 0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/30] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from skl_universal_plane.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:22 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24 0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/30] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_power.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:28 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24 0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/30] drm/i915/display: remove CNL ddi buf translation tables Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:56 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24 0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/30] drm/i915/display: rename CNL references in skl_scaler.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:11 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24 0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/30] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from i915_irq.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:59 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-26 15:06 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-24 0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/30] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pm.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 11:08 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24 0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/30] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_mocs.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:21 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24 0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/30] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pch.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:14 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24 0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/30] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_wopcm.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:57 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24 0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/30] drm/i915/gt: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_sseu.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 23:21 ` Matt Roper
2021-07-24 0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/30] drm/i915: rename CNL references in intel_dram.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:22 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24 0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/30] drm/i915/gt: rename CNL references in intel_engine.h Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:38 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24 0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/30] drm/i915: finish removal of CNL Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:21 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2021-07-24 0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/30] drm/i915: remove GRAPHICS_VER == 10 Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:08 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24 0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/30] drm/i915: rename/remove CNL registers Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:06 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24 0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 29/30] drm/i915: replace random CNL comments Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:09 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24 0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 30/30] drm/i915: switch num_scalers/num_sprites to consider DISPLAY_VER Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:13 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-27 6:59 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-24 0:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Remove CNL support Patchwork
2021-07-24 0:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-07-24 1:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-24 2:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/30] " Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-24 12:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for " Patchwork
2021-07-26 11:07 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-26 13:59 ` Lucas De Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YP6MpaAGIkH81MnH@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).