intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Make the kmem slab for i915_buddy_block a global
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 20:56:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YPht8s0wtnUxuF5q@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23df1788-bd8e-ac44-337d-92bb5f345b8f@intel.com>

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 05:25:41PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> On 21/07/2021 16:23, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > There's no reason that I can tell why this should be per-i915_buddy_mm
> > and doing so causes KMEM_CACHE to throw dmesg warnings because it tries
> > to create a debugfs entry with the name i915_buddy_block multiple times.
> > We could handle this by carefully giving each slab its own name but that
> > brings its own pain because then we have to store that string somewhere
> > and manage the lifetimes of the different slabs.  The most likely
> > outcome would be a global atomic which we increment to get a new name or
> > something like that.
> > 
> > The much easier solution is to use the i915_globals system like we do
> > for every other slab in i915.  This ensures that we have exactly one of
> > them for each i915 driver load and it gets neatly created on module load
> > and destroyed on module unload.  Using the globals system also means
> > that its now tied into the shrink handler so we can properly respond to
> > low-memory situations.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
> > Fixes: 88be9a0a06b7 ("drm/i915/ttm: add ttm_buddy_man")
> > Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> > Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> 
> It was intentionally ripped it out with the idea that we would be moving the
> buddy stuff into ttm, and so part of that was trying to get rid of the some
> of the i915 specifics, like this globals thing.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>

I just sent out a patch to put i915_globals on a diet, so maybe we can
hold this patch here a bit when there's other reasons for why this is
special?

Or at least no make this use the i915_globals stuff and instead just link
up the init/exit function calls directly into Jason's new table, so that
we don't have a merge conflict here?
-Daniel

> 
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_buddy.c   | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_buddy.h   |  3 +-
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_globals.c |  2 ++
> >   3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_buddy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_buddy.c
> > index 29dd7d0310c1f..911feedad4513 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_buddy.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_buddy.c
> > @@ -8,8 +8,14 @@
> >   #include "i915_buddy.h"
> >   #include "i915_gem.h"
> > +#include "i915_globals.h"
> >   #include "i915_utils.h"
> > +static struct i915_global_buddy {
> > +	struct i915_global base;
> > +	struct kmem_cache *slab_blocks;
> > +} global;
> > +
> >   static struct i915_buddy_block *i915_block_alloc(struct i915_buddy_mm *mm,
> >   						 struct i915_buddy_block *parent,
> >   						 unsigned int order,
> > @@ -19,7 +25,7 @@ static struct i915_buddy_block *i915_block_alloc(struct i915_buddy_mm *mm,
> >   	GEM_BUG_ON(order > I915_BUDDY_MAX_ORDER);
> > -	block = kmem_cache_zalloc(mm->slab_blocks, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	block = kmem_cache_zalloc(global.slab_blocks, GFP_KERNEL);
> >   	if (!block)
> >   		return NULL;
> > @@ -34,7 +40,7 @@ static struct i915_buddy_block *i915_block_alloc(struct i915_buddy_mm *mm,
> >   static void i915_block_free(struct i915_buddy_mm *mm,
> >   			    struct i915_buddy_block *block)
> >   {
> > -	kmem_cache_free(mm->slab_blocks, block);
> > +	kmem_cache_free(global.slab_blocks, block);
> >   }
> >   static void mark_allocated(struct i915_buddy_block *block)
> > @@ -85,15 +91,11 @@ int i915_buddy_init(struct i915_buddy_mm *mm, u64 size, u64 chunk_size)
> >   	GEM_BUG_ON(mm->max_order > I915_BUDDY_MAX_ORDER);
> > -	mm->slab_blocks = KMEM_CACHE(i915_buddy_block, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN);
> > -	if (!mm->slab_blocks)
> > -		return -ENOMEM;
> > -
> >   	mm->free_list = kmalloc_array(mm->max_order + 1,
> >   				      sizeof(struct list_head),
> >   				      GFP_KERNEL);
> >   	if (!mm->free_list)
> > -		goto out_destroy_slab;
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> >   	for (i = 0; i <= mm->max_order; ++i)
> >   		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mm->free_list[i]);
> > @@ -145,8 +147,6 @@ int i915_buddy_init(struct i915_buddy_mm *mm, u64 size, u64 chunk_size)
> >   	kfree(mm->roots);
> >   out_free_list:
> >   	kfree(mm->free_list);
> > -out_destroy_slab:
> > -	kmem_cache_destroy(mm->slab_blocks);
> >   	return -ENOMEM;
> >   }
> > @@ -161,7 +161,6 @@ void i915_buddy_fini(struct i915_buddy_mm *mm)
> >   	kfree(mm->roots);
> >   	kfree(mm->free_list);
> > -	kmem_cache_destroy(mm->slab_blocks);
> >   }
> >   static int split_block(struct i915_buddy_mm *mm,
> > @@ -410,3 +409,28 @@ int i915_buddy_alloc_range(struct i915_buddy_mm *mm,
> >   #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST)
> >   #include "selftests/i915_buddy.c"
> >   #endif
> > +
> > +static void i915_global_buddy_shrink(void)
> > +{
> > +	kmem_cache_shrink(global.slab_blocks);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void i915_global_buddy_exit(void)
> > +{
> > +	kmem_cache_destroy(global.slab_blocks);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct i915_global_buddy global = { {
> > +	.shrink = i915_global_buddy_shrink,
> > +	.exit = i915_global_buddy_exit,
> > +} };
> > +
> > +int __init i915_global_buddy_init(void)
> > +{
> > +	global.slab_blocks = KMEM_CACHE(i915_buddy_block, 0);
> > +	if (!global.slab_blocks)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	i915_global_register(&global.base);
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_buddy.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_buddy.h
> > index 37f8c42071d12..d8f26706de52f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_buddy.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_buddy.h
> > @@ -47,7 +47,6 @@ struct i915_buddy_block {
> >    * i915_buddy_alloc* and i915_buddy_free* should suffice.
> >    */
> >   struct i915_buddy_mm {
> > -	struct kmem_cache *slab_blocks;
> >   	/* Maintain a free list for each order. */
> >   	struct list_head *free_list;
> > @@ -130,4 +129,6 @@ void i915_buddy_free(struct i915_buddy_mm *mm, struct i915_buddy_block *block);
> >   void i915_buddy_free_list(struct i915_buddy_mm *mm, struct list_head *objects);
> > +int i915_global_buddy_init(void);
> > +
> >   #endif
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_globals.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_globals.c
> > index 87267e1d2ad92..e57102a4c8d16 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_globals.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_globals.c
> > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> >   #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> >   #include "i915_active.h"
> > +#include "i915_buddy.h"
> >   #include "gem/i915_gem_context.h"
> >   #include "gem/i915_gem_object.h"
> >   #include "i915_globals.h"
> > @@ -87,6 +88,7 @@ static void __i915_globals_cleanup(void)
> >   static __initconst int (* const initfn[])(void) = {
> >   	i915_global_active_init,
> > +	i915_global_buddy_init,
> >   	i915_global_context_init,
> >   	i915_global_gem_context_init,
> >   	i915_global_objects_init,
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-21 18:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-21 15:23 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] Fix the debugfs splat from mock selftests (v3) Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-21 15:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Call i915_globals_exit() after i915_pmu_exit() Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-21 15:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Call i915_globals_exit() if pci_register_device() fails Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-21 15:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Use a table for i915_init/exit (v2) Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-21 15:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/ttm: Force re-init if ttm_global_init() fails Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-22 10:05   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-21 15:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/ttm: Initialize debugfs from ttm_global_init() Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-22 10:09   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-21 15:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Make the kmem slab for i915_buddy_block a global Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-21 16:25   ` Matthew Auld
2021-07-21 18:56     ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2021-07-21 20:15       ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-22 10:08         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-21 15:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Fix the debugfs splat from mock selftests (rev3) Patchwork
2021-07-21 15:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-07-21 15:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-07-21 16:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-21 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-07-20 18:13 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] Fix the debugfs splat from mock selftests Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-20 18:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Make the kmem slab for i915_buddy_block a global Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-19 18:30 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] Fix the debugfs splat from mock selftests Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-19 18:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Make the kmem slab for i915_buddy_block a global Jason Ekstrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YPht8s0wtnUxuF5q@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).