intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Belgaumkar, Vinay" <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/15] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Gate Host RPS when SLPC is enabled
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:48:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7a66767-507f-ad40-f58b-c61acb87b0e3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210727224402.GA49579@DUT151-ICLU.fm.intel.com>



On 7/27/2021 3:44 PM, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 12:07:48PM -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>> Also ensure uc_init is called before we initialize RPS so that we
>> can check for SLPC support. We do not need to enable up/down
>> interrupts when SLPC is enabled. However, we still need the ARAT
>> interrupt, which will be enabled separately later.
>>
> 
> Do we not need a check for rps_uses_slpc in intel_rps_enable? I guessing
> there is a reason why we don't but can't seem to figure that out.

Yeah, it's due to this check in there -
if (rps->max_freq <= rps->min_freq)
                 /* leave disabled, no room for dynamic reclocking */;

With slpc, rps->max_freq and rps->min freq remain uninitialized, so the 
if condition just falls through and returns with this-
if (!enabled)
                 return;

Thanks,
Vinay.

> 
> Matt
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Sundaresan Sujaritha <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c  |  2 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
>> index a64aa43f7cd9..04dd69bcf6cb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c
>> @@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ void intel_gt_init_early(struct intel_gt *gt, struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>>   	intel_gt_init_timelines(gt);
>>   	intel_gt_pm_init_early(gt);
>>   
>> -	intel_rps_init_early(&gt->rps);
>>   	intel_uc_init_early(&gt->uc);
>> +	intel_rps_init_early(&gt->rps);
>>   }
>>   
>>   int intel_gt_probe_lmem(struct intel_gt *gt)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
>> index 0c8e7f2b06f0..e858eeb2c59d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
>> @@ -37,6 +37,13 @@ static struct intel_uncore *rps_to_uncore(struct intel_rps *rps)
>>   	return rps_to_gt(rps)->uncore;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static bool rps_uses_slpc(struct intel_rps *rps)
>> +{
>> +	struct intel_gt *gt = rps_to_gt(rps);
>> +
>> +	return intel_uc_uses_guc_slpc(&gt->uc);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static u32 rps_pm_sanitize_mask(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 mask)
>>   {
>>   	return mask & ~rps->pm_intrmsk_mbz;
>> @@ -167,6 +174,8 @@ static void rps_enable_interrupts(struct intel_rps *rps)
>>   {
>>   	struct intel_gt *gt = rps_to_gt(rps);
>>   
>> +	GEM_BUG_ON(rps_uses_slpc(rps));
>> +
>>   	GT_TRACE(gt, "interrupts:on rps->pm_events: %x, rps_pm_mask:%x\n",
>>   		 rps->pm_events, rps_pm_mask(rps, rps->last_freq));
>>   
>> @@ -771,6 +780,8 @@ static int gen6_rps_set(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 val)
>>   	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = rps_to_i915(rps);
>>   	u32 swreq;
>>   
>> +	GEM_BUG_ON(rps_uses_slpc(rps));
>> +
>>   	if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 9)
>>   		swreq = GEN9_FREQUENCY(val);
>>   	else if (IS_HASWELL(i915) || IS_BROADWELL(i915))
>> @@ -861,6 +872,9 @@ void intel_rps_park(struct intel_rps *rps)
>>   {
>>   	int adj;
>>   
>> +	if (!intel_rps_is_enabled(rps))
>> +		return;
>> +
>>   	GEM_BUG_ON(atomic_read(&rps->num_waiters));
>>   
>>   	if (!intel_rps_clear_active(rps))
>> @@ -1829,6 +1843,9 @@ void intel_rps_init(struct intel_rps *rps)
>>   {
>>   	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = rps_to_i915(rps);
>>   
>> +	if (rps_uses_slpc(rps))
>> +		return;
>> +
>>   	if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(i915))
>>   		chv_rps_init(rps);
>>   	else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(i915))
>> @@ -1885,6 +1902,9 @@ void intel_rps_init(struct intel_rps *rps)
>>   
>>   void intel_rps_sanitize(struct intel_rps *rps)
>>   {
>> +	if (rps_uses_slpc(rps))
>> +		return;
>> +
>>   	if (GRAPHICS_VER(rps_to_i915(rps)) >= 6)
>>   		rps_disable_interrupts(rps);
>>   }
>> -- 
>> 2.25.0
>>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-27 22:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-26 19:07 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 00/15] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Enable GuC based power management features Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-26 19:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/15] drm/i915/guc: SQUASHED PATCH - DO NOT REVIEW Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-26 19:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/15] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Initial definitions for SLPC Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-27 13:43   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-27 18:47     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-26 19:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/15] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Gate Host RPS when SLPC is enabled Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-27 22:44   ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-27 22:48     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay [this message]
2021-07-27 22:50       ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-26 19:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/15] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Adding SLPC communication interfaces Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-27 13:59   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-27 19:03     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-26 19:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/15] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Allocate, initialize and release SLPC Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-27 14:03   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-26 19:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/15] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Enable SLPC and add related H2G events Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-27 15:12   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-27 20:00     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-27 20:19       ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-27 20:52         ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-26 19:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/15] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Remove BUG_ON in guc_submission_disable Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-28  0:20   ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-28  1:01     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-28  1:06       ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-26 19:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/15] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add methods to set min/max frequency Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-27 15:24   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-27 22:35     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-28  4:03     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-26 19:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/15] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add get max/min freq hooks Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-27 15:32   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-27 23:10     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-26 19:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/15] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add debugfs for SLPC info Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-27 15:37   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-28  0:10     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-26 19:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/15] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Enable ARAT timer interrupt Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-27 15:40   ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-28  0:15     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-26 19:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/15] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Cache platform frequency limits Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-27 16:00   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-28  1:27     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-26 19:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/15] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Sysfs hooks for SLPC Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-27 16:59   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-28 15:29     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-26 19:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/15] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add SLPC selftest Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-27 19:16   ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-27 22:25     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-26 19:08 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/15] drm/i915/guc/rc: Setup and enable GUCRC feature Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-27 15:37   ` Matt Roper
2021-07-27 16:18     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-27 19:49       ` Matt Roper
2021-07-26 19:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/guc/slpc: Enable GuC based power management features Patchwork
2021-07-26 19:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-07-26 19:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-26 23:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b7a66767-507f-ad40-f58b-c61acb87b0e3@intel.com \
    --to=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).