From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/lvds: Use
	i915.lvds_fixed_mode= as a last resort
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 23:37:36 +0100
Message-ID: <b7da2f$r6j58i@fmsmga001.fm.intel.com>
References: <1303022613-18414-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
	<1303022613-18414-2-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
	<alpine.DEB.1.10.1104201419170.31843@cnc.isely.net>
	<b7da2f$r640mo@fmsmga001.fm.intel.com>
	<alpine.DEB.1.10.1104201458440.31843@cnc.isely.net>
	<alpine.DEB.1.10.1104211657160.18161@cnc.isely.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6579E759
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Thu, 21 Apr 2011 15:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1104211657160.18161@cnc.isely.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Mike Isely <isely@isely.net>
Cc: Dave Airlied <airlied@linux.ie>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 17:30:21 -0500 (CDT), Mike Isely <isely@isely.net> wrote:
> It looks like the driver did notice the specified mode and used it - 
> because the display's refresh rate did get adjusted and the overall 
> resolution is correct.  However the display timings are slightly "off", 
> the image is stretched a few pixels off the right edge and a few lines 
> off the bottom edge.  Yet the same modeline given to "video=" in 
> combination with my controversial disable-fixed-mode patch however 
> produces a perfectly aligned image.

Adding a few printk will help. And perhaps comparing the resultant register
settings with intel_reg_dumper.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre