From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Patchwork <patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org>,
"Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [01/25] dma-buf: add dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked v5
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 10:11:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e0aada02-8a1c-dfd3-d855-8776259b27fb@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <163240233283.31050.11977750526229880215@emeril.freedesktop.org>
On 23/09/2021 14:05, Patchwork wrote:
[snip]
> *
>
> igt@gem_busy@busy@all:
>
> o fi-apl-guc: PASS
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10630/fi-apl-guc/igt@gem_busy@busy@all.html>
> -> FAIL
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21144/fi-apl-guc/igt@gem_busy@busy@all.html>
> +2 similar issues
All seem to be the same failure:
(gem_busy:874) igt_dummyload-CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function igt_spin_factory, file ../lib/igt_dummyload.c:490:
(gem_busy:874) igt_dummyload-CRITICAL: Failed assertion: gem_bo_busy(fd, spin->handle)
Which is saying spinner which was just submitted is not immediately reported as busy. And that sounds impossible. Must be a pretty basic bug somewhere which I don't immediately see. Like unlocked iterator failing to walk the fences or something.
Regards,
Tvrtko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-24 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-23 7:55 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/25] dma-buf: add dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked v5 Christian König
2021-09-23 7:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/25] dma-buf: add dma_resv_for_each_fence Christian König
2021-09-23 7:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/25] dma-buf: use new iterator in dma_resv_copy_fences Christian König
2021-09-23 7:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/25] dma-buf: use new iterator in dma_resv_get_fences v3 Christian König
2021-09-23 7:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/25] dma-buf: use new iterator in dma_resv_wait_timeout Christian König
2021-09-23 7:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/25] dma-buf: use new iterator in dma_resv_test_signaled Christian König
2021-09-23 7:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/25] drm/ttm: use the new iterator in ttm_bo_flush_all_fences Christian König
2021-09-23 7:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/25] drm/amdgpu: use the new iterator in amdgpu_sync_resv Christian König
2021-09-23 7:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/25] drm/amdgpu: use new iterator in amdgpu_ttm_bo_eviction_valuable Christian König
2021-09-23 7:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/25] drm/amdgpu: use new iterator in amdgpu_vm_prt_fini Christian König
2021-09-23 7:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/25] drm/msm: use new iterator in msm_gem_describe Christian König
2021-09-23 7:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/25] drm/radeon: use new iterator in radeon_sync_resv Christian König
2021-09-23 7:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/25] drm/scheduler: use new iterator in drm_sched_job_add_implicit_dependencies v2 Christian König
2021-09-23 7:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/25] drm/i915: use the new iterator in i915_gem_busy_ioctl v2 Christian König
2021-09-24 9:08 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-09-23 7:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/25] drm/i915: use the new iterator in i915_sw_fence_await_reservation v3 Christian König
2021-09-23 7:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/25] drm/i915: use the new iterator in i915_request_await_object v2 Christian König
2021-09-23 7:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/25] drm/i915: use new iterator in i915_gem_object_wait_reservation Christian König
2021-09-23 7:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/25] drm/i915: use new iterator in i915_gem_object_wait_priority Christian König
2021-09-23 7:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/25] drm/i915: use new cursor in intel_prepare_plane_fb Christian König
2021-09-23 7:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/25] drm: use new iterator in drm_gem_fence_array_add_implicit v3 Christian König
2021-09-23 7:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/25] drm: use new iterator in drm_gem_plane_helper_prepare_fb Christian König
2021-09-23 7:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/25] drm/nouveau: use the new iterator in nouveau_fence_sync Christian König
2021-09-23 7:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/25] drm/nouveau: use the new interator in nv50_wndw_prepare_fb Christian König
2021-09-23 7:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/25] drm/etnaviv: use new iterator in etnaviv_gem_describe Christian König
2021-09-23 7:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/25] drm/etnaviv: replace dma_resv_get_excl_unlocked Christian König
2021-09-23 12:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/25] dma-buf: add dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked v5 Patchwork
2021-09-23 12:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-09-23 13:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-09-24 9:11 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2021-09-24 9:13 ` Christian König
2021-09-24 10:08 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e0aada02-8a1c-dfd3-d855-8776259b27fb@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).