intel-xe.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/6] drm/xe: Use full_gt batchbuffer allocation for media tiles.
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 07:17:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230406141755.GL4085390@mdroper-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fb5a81af-e95e-cbca-ec5b-7a98bafdcc34@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 08:59:27AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> 
> On 2023-04-03 22:27, Matt Roper wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 12:24:15PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> > > This fixes an oops on media tiles, because we don't initialise the
> > > bb pool.
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c | 10 +++++++---
> > >   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> > > index bc821f431c45..c7a2e9baabfb 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> > > @@ -237,6 +237,10 @@ int xe_gt_record_default_lrcs(struct xe_gt *gt)
> > >   		struct xe_engine *e, *nop_e;
> > >   		struct xe_vm *vm;
> > >   		void *default_lrc;
> > > +		struct xe_gt *full_gt = gt;
> > > +
> > > +		if (xe_gt_is_media_type(gt))
> > > +			full_gt = xe_find_full_gt(gt);
> > >   		if (gt->default_lrc[hwe->class])
> > >   			continue;
> > > @@ -262,7 +266,7 @@ int xe_gt_record_default_lrcs(struct xe_gt *gt)
> > >   		}
> > >   		/* Prime golden LRC with known good state */
> > > -		err = emit_wa_job(gt, e);
> > > +		err = emit_wa_job(full_gt, e);
> > If we pass the primary GT here, then we'll take the wrong path in
> > bb_prefetch().  That doesn't actually matter very much (we'll just
> > overestimate the padding needed for media engines, which is safe and
> > something we already do for BCS engines), but we should probably just
> > drop !xe_gt_is_media_type(gt) condition there as part of this patch
> > since it will always be true now.
> 
> Yeah makes sense. That check doesn't strictly speaking seem to be needed, so
> I'm fine with dropping it.
> 
> We could always request the engine to be specified, but I don't think we
> really use those batchbuffers beyond initialisation outside of
> migration/VM_BIND,
> 
> which is done on a BCS engine anyway.
> 
> Can I have your r-b with that check removed?

Yeah,

Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

Thanks.


Matt

> 
> ~Maarten
> 

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
Linux GPU Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-06 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-31 10:24 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/6] drm/xe: Meteorlake fixes Maarten Lankhorst
2023-03-31 10:24 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/6] drm/xe: Fix meteorlake stolen memory Maarten Lankhorst
2023-04-04 17:42   ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-03-31 10:24 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/6] drm/xe: Use full_gt batchbuffer allocation for media tiles Maarten Lankhorst
2023-04-03 20:27   ` Matt Roper
2023-04-04  6:59     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2023-04-06 14:17       ` Matt Roper [this message]
2023-03-31 10:24 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Fix comparison in intel_dram Maarten Lankhorst
2023-04-03 20:35   ` Matt Roper
2023-04-03 20:48     ` [Intel-xe] [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2023-04-04  6:51     ` [Intel-xe] " Maarten Lankhorst
2023-04-04  0:10   ` [Intel-xe] [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2023-03-31 10:24 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/6] drm/xe: Fix XE_LPDP and meteorlake display info Maarten Lankhorst
2023-04-04 17:57   ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-03-31 10:24 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 5/6] drm/xe: Build soc files directly Maarten Lankhorst
2023-03-31 11:49   ` Jani Nikula
2023-03-31 12:01     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2023-04-03  8:12       ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-03 10:28         ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 " Maarten Lankhorst
2023-04-19 14:43           ` Jani Nikula
2023-03-31 10:24 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 6/6] drm/xe: Fixup __intel_de_wait_for_register macro Maarten Lankhorst
2023-04-04 18:05   ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-03-31 10:26 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Meteorlake fixes Patchwork
2023-03-31 10:27 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
2023-04-03 10:31 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for drm/xe: Meteorlake fixes. (rev2) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230406141755.GL4085390@mdroper-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).