messages from 2023-04-15 04:37:35 to 2023-04-21 08:21:23 UTC [more...]
[Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/4] GuC submission with doorbells
2023-04-21 8:21 UTC (4+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/4] drm/xe/guc: Read HXG fields from DW1 of G2H response
[Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/4] RFC: Add new device configuration infrastructure to
2023-04-21 4:15 UTC (12+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/4] drm/xe: Refactor early device init
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/4] drm/xe: Refactor debugfs into an early and late part
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/4] drm/xe: Add new device configuration debugfs infrastructure
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/4] drm/xe: Migrate module parameters to new debugfs structure
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for RFC: Add new device configuration infrastructure to
[Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: Set default MOCS value for cs instructions
2023-04-21 1:34 UTC (6+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info for series starting with [1/2] "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe: Set default MOCS value for cs instructions (rev2)
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info "
[Intel-xe] [PATCH v2] drm/xe: Fix xe_mmio_rmw32 operation
2023-04-21 0:45 UTC (6+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info "
[Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Enable d3cold support for dgfx
2023-04-20 20:48 UTC (2+ messages)
[Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/9] xe & i915 display integration cleanups
2023-04-20 19:59 UTC (24+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/9] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915/wm: remove stale and unused ilk_wm_max_level() declaration
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/display: add I915 conditional build to i9xx_wm.h
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/9] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915: rename intel_pm.[ch] to intel_clock_gating.[ch]
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 6/9] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915: use explicit includes for i915_reg.h and i915_irq.h
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 8/9] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 9/9] fixup! drm/i915/display: Remaining changes to make xe compile
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for xe & i915 display integration cleanups
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info "
[Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 0/3] drm/xe: switch to using drm_exec
2023-04-20 18:51 UTC (8+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 1/3] drm: execution context for GEM buffers v3
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 2/3] drm_exec: fix double dma_resv unlock
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 3/3] drm/xe: switch to using drm_exec
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info "
[Intel-xe] [PATCH v4] drm/i915: Initialize dkl_phy spin lock from display code path
2023-04-20 17:54 UTC (11+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for drm/i915: Initialize dkl_phy spin lock from display code path (rev3)
` [Intel-xe] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4] drm/i915: Initialize dkl_phy spin lock from display code path
[Intel-xe] [PATCH v2] drm/xe/guc_pc: Reorder forcewake and xe_pm_runtime calls
2023-04-20 13:03 UTC (6+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/guc_pc: Reorder forcewake and xe_pm_runtime calls (rev2)
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info "
[Intel-xe] [PATCH] xe/xe_bo: Reject bo creation of unaligned size
2023-04-20 8:52 UTC (2+ messages)
[Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 0/3] drm/xe: switch to using drm_exec
2023-04-19 23:52 UTC (8+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 1/3] drm: execution context for GEM buffers v3
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 2/3] drm_exec: fix double dma_resv unlock
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 3/3] drm/xe: switch to using drm_exec
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: switch to using drm_exec (rev3)
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.KUnit: failure "
[Intel-xe] [PATCH 00/17] Cleanup registers and introduce xe_reg_t
2023-04-19 23:38 UTC (41+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 01/17] drm/xe: Cleanup page-related defines
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 02/17] fixup! drm/i915/display: Remaining changes to make xe compile
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 03/17] fixup! drm/i915/display: Allow fbdev to allocate stolen memory
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 04/17] drm/xe: Rename RC0/RC6 macros
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 05/17] drm/xe: Rename instruction field to avoid confusion
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 06/17] drm/xe/guc: Rename GEN11_SOFT_SCRATCH for clarity
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 07/17] drm/xe/guc: Move GuC registers to regs/
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 08/17] drm/xe/guc: Convert GuC registers to REG_FIELD/REG_BIT
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 09/17] drm/xe: Drop gen prefixes and suffixes from registers
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 10/17] drm/xe: Use REG_FIELD/REG_BIT for all regs/*.h
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 11/17] drm/xe: Introduce xe_reg_t
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 12/17] drm/xe: Clarify register types on PAT programming
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 13/17] drm/xe/rtp: Improve magic macros for RTP tables
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 14/17] drm/xe: Add XE_REG/XE_REG_MCR
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 15/17] drm/xe: Annotate masked registers used by RTP
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 16/17] drm/xe: Plumb xe_reg_t into WAs, rtp, etc
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 17/17] drm/xe: Move helper macros to separate header
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Cleanup registers and introduce xe_reg_t
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info "
[Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/sr: Apply masked registers properly
2023-04-19 23:18 UTC (7+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info "
[Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/adlp: Add revid => step mapping
2023-04-19 23:01 UTC (8+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe/adln: Enable ADL-N
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe/adlp: Add revid => step mapping
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info "
[Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/guc_pc: Reorder forcewake and xe_pm_runtime calls
2023-04-19 20:25 UTC (6+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info "
[Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/doc/rfc: Introduce the merge plan for the Xe driver
2023-04-19 19:48 UTC (9+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/doc/rfc: Introduce the merge plan for the Xe driver. (rev2)
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/doc/rfc: Introduce the merge plan for the Xe driver. (rev3)
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info "
[Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/doc/rfc: Introduce the merge plan for the Xe driver
2023-04-19 19:19 UTC (4+ messages)
[Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/6] drm/xe: Meteorlake fixes
2023-04-19 14:43 UTC (7+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 5/6] drm/xe: Build soc files directly
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 "
[Intel-xe] [PATCH] fixup! drm/xe: Select graphics/media descriptors from GMD_ID
2023-04-19 14:27 UTC (6+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info "
[Intel-xe] [PATCH v2] drm/xe/tlb: fix expected_seqno calculation
2023-04-19 9:16 UTC (5+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/tlb: fix expected_seqno calculation (rev2)
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info "
[Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Drop GFX_FLSH_CNTL_GEN6 write during GGTT invalidation
2023-04-18 23:30 UTC (5+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info "
[Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe: add infrastructure for per engine tuning
2023-04-18 20:42 UTC (6+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe: add gt tuning for indirect state
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/xe: add infrastructure for per engine tuning
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info "
[Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/tlb: fix expected_seqno calculation
2023-04-18 20:13 UTC (6+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: "
` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: "
` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info "
[Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 00/10] Xe DRM scheduler and long running workload plans
2023-04-18 15:10 UTC (16+ messages)
[Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 0/8] Meteorlake interrupt & TLB handling updates
2023-04-17 21:41 UTC (5+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 1/8] drm/xe/irq: Cleanup media GT interrupt flow
[Intel-xe] [RFC 0/2] Dump + OOB workarounds
2023-04-17 21:16 UTC (3+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] [RFC 1/2] drm/xe: Add debugfs to dump all known workarounds
[Intel-xe] [RFC 0/3] drm/xe: Introduce eudebug event interface
2023-04-17 17:52 UTC (5+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] [RFC 1/3] drm/xe/eudebug: Export GPL symbol ptrace_may_access
` [Intel-xe] [RFC 2/3] drm/xe/eudebug: Introduce eudebug support
[Intel-xe] [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Initialize dkl_phy spin lock from display code path
2023-04-17 16:01 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for drm/i915: Initialize dkl_phy spin lock from display code path (rev2)
[Intel-xe] [PATCH 00/41] xe & i915 display integration ifdef cleanups, part 2
2023-04-17 10:53 UTC (3+ messages)
[Intel-xe] [PATCH RESEND v3 0/3] drm/ttm: Small fixes / cleanups in prep for shrinking
2023-04-17 8:02 UTC (12+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] [PATCH RESEND v3 2/3] drm/ttm: Reduce the number of used allocation orders for TTM pages
[Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 0/1] drm/xe: switch to using drm_exec
2023-04-17 0:24 UTC (3+ messages)
` [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 1/1] "
page: next (older) | prev (newer) | latest
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).