Re: [PATCH liburing 0/1] test: add epoll test case

[Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 11:07:41AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 1/27/20 11:00 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 09:26:41AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> On 1/27/20 9:17 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> >>> Hi Jens,
> >>> I wrote the test case for epoll.
> >>>
> >>> Since it fails also without sqpoll (Linux 5.4.13-201.fc31.x86_64),
> >>> can you take a look to understand if the test is wrong?
> >>>
> >>> Tomorrow I'll travel, but on Wednesday I'll try this test with the patch
> >>> that I sent and also with the upstream kernel.
> >>
> >> I'll take a look, but your patches are coming through garbled and don't
> >> apply.
> > 
> > Weird, I'm using git-publish as usual. I tried to download the patch
> > received from the ML, and I tried to reapply and it seams to work here.
> > 
> > Which kind of issue do you have? (just to fix my setup)
> 
> First I grabbed it from email, and I get the usual =3D (instead of =)
> and =20 instead of a space. Longer lines also broken up, with an = at
> the end.
> 
> Then I grabbed it from the lore io-uring archive, but it was the exact
> same thing.

I saw! I'll try to fix my setup.
The strange thing is that my git (v2.24.1) is able to apply that
malformed patch!

> 
> > Anyway I pushed my tree here:
> >     https://github.com/stefano-garzarella/liburing.git epoll
> 
> As per other email, I think you're having some coordination issues
> with the reaping and submitting side being separated. If the reaper
> isn't keeping up, you'll get the -EBUSY problem I saw. I'm assuming
> that's the failure case you are also seeing, you didn't actually
> mention how it fails for you?

My fault, I sent more information on the issue that I'm seeing.

Thanks,
Stefano