io-uring.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hao Xu <haoxu@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
	Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: fix failed linkchain code logic
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 11:25:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210823032506.34857-3-haoxu@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210823032506.34857-1-haoxu@linux.alibaba.com>

Given a linkchain like this:
req0(link_flag)-->req1(link_flag)-->...-->reqn(no link_flag)

There is a problem:
 - if some intermediate linked req like req1 's submittion fails, reqs
   after it won't be cancelled.

   - sqpoll disabled: maybe it's ok since users can get the error info
     of req1 and stop submitting the following sqes.

   - sqpoll enabled: definitely a problem, the following sqes will be
     submitted in the next round.

The solution is to refactor the code logic to:
 - if a linked req's submittion fails, just mark it and the head(if it
   exists) as REQ_F_FAIL. Leverage req->result to indicate whether it
   is failed or cancelled.
 - submit or fail the whole chain when we come to the end of it.

Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <haoxu@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 44b1b2b58e6a..9ae8f2a5c584 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1776,8 +1776,6 @@ static void io_preinit_req(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 	req->ctx = ctx;
 	req->link = NULL;
 	req->async_data = NULL;
-	/* not necessary, but safer to zero */
-	req->result = 0;
 }
 
 static void io_flush_cached_locked_reqs(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
@@ -1931,11 +1929,16 @@ static void io_fail_links(struct io_kiocb *req)
 
 	req->link = NULL;
 	while (link) {
+		long res = -ECANCELED;
+
+		if (link->flags & REQ_F_FAIL)
+			res = link->result;
+
 		nxt = link->link;
 		link->link = NULL;
 
 		trace_io_uring_fail_link(req, link);
-		io_cqring_fill_event(link->ctx, link->user_data, -ECANCELED, 0);
+		io_cqring_fill_event(link->ctx, link->user_data, res, 0);
 		io_put_req_deferred(link);
 		link = nxt;
 	}
@@ -6527,8 +6530,12 @@ static inline void io_queue_sqe(struct io_kiocb *req)
 	if (unlikely(req->ctx->drain_active) && io_drain_req(req))
 		return;
 
-	if (likely(!(req->flags & REQ_F_FORCE_ASYNC))) {
+	if (likely(!(req->flags & (REQ_F_FORCE_ASYNC | REQ_F_FAIL)))) {
 		__io_queue_sqe(req);
+	} else if (req->flags & REQ_F_FAIL) {
+		long res = req->result ? : -ECANCELED;
+
+		io_req_complete_failed(req, res);
 	} else {
 		int ret = io_req_prep_async(req);
 
@@ -6637,19 +6644,25 @@ static int io_submit_sqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,
 	ret = io_init_req(ctx, req, sqe);
 	if (unlikely(ret)) {
 fail_req:
+		/* fail even hard links since we don't submit */
 		if (link->head) {
-			/* fail even hard links since we don't submit */
-			io_req_complete_failed(link->head, -ECANCELED);
-			link->head = NULL;
+			req_set_fail(link->head);
+		} else if (!(req->flags & (REQ_F_LINK | REQ_F_HARDLINK))) {
+			/*
+			 * the current req is a normal req, we should return
+			 * error and thus break the submittion loop.
+			 */
+			io_req_complete_failed(req, ret);
+			return ret;
 		}
-		io_req_complete_failed(req, ret);
-		return ret;
+		req_set_fail(req);
+		req->result = ret;
+	} else {
+		ret = io_req_prep(req, sqe);
+		if (unlikely(ret))
+			goto fail_req;
 	}
 
-	ret = io_req_prep(req, sqe);
-	if (unlikely(ret))
-		goto fail_req;
-
 	/* don't need @sqe from now on */
 	trace_io_uring_submit_sqe(ctx, req, req->opcode, req->user_data,
 				  req->flags, true,
@@ -6665,9 +6678,14 @@ static int io_submit_sqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,
 	if (link->head) {
 		struct io_kiocb *head = link->head;
 
-		ret = io_req_prep_async(req);
-		if (unlikely(ret))
-			goto fail_req;
+		if (!(req->flags & REQ_F_FAIL)) {
+			ret = io_req_prep_async(req);
+			if (unlikely(ret)) {
+				req->result = ret;
+				req_set_fail(req);
+				req_set_fail(link->head);
+			}
+		}
 		trace_io_uring_link(ctx, req, head);
 		link->last->link = req;
 		link->last = req;
@@ -6681,6 +6699,17 @@ static int io_submit_sqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,
 		if (req->flags & (REQ_F_LINK | REQ_F_HARDLINK)) {
 			link->head = req;
 			link->last = req;
+			/*
+			 * we can judge a link req is failed or cancelled by if
+			 * REQ_F_FAIL is set, but the head is an exception since
+			 * it may be set REQ_F_FAIL because of other req's failure
+			 * so let's leverage req->result to distinguish if a head
+			 * is set REQ_F_FAIL because of its failure or other req's
+			 * failure so that we can set the correct ret code for it.
+			 * init result here to avoid affecting the normal path.
+			 */
+			if (!(req->flags & REQ_F_FAIL))
+				req->result = 0;
 		} else {
 			io_queue_sqe(req);
 		}
-- 
2.24.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-23  3:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-23  3:25 [PATCH for-5.15 v2 0/2] fix failed linkchain code logic Hao Xu
2021-08-23  3:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: remove redundant req_set_fail() Hao Xu
2021-08-23  3:25 ` Hao Xu [this message]
2021-08-23 11:02   ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: fix failed linkchain code logic Pavel Begunkov
2021-08-23 17:12     ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-08-23 18:45     ` Hao Xu
2021-08-27  9:46 [PATCH for-5.15 v3 0/2] " Hao Xu
2021-08-27  9:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: " Hao Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210823032506.34857-3-haoxu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=haoxu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).