From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2247BC433DB for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 19:09:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE23923A5E for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 19:09:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729312AbhAOTJN (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jan 2021 14:09:13 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40110 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728818AbhAOTJN (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jan 2021 14:09:13 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-xd29.google.com (mail-io1-xd29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d29]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA47CC061757 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 11:08:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-io1-xd29.google.com with SMTP id n2so3027057iom.7 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 11:08:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1+Ziv14g0JJYERomYNbosTJBQniZoL1nqQ2JhYv6bpY=; b=wn4oDOK8RKRTyDCnH8D4Ya8TiPPFpD3B3gdC5q2y5rjjOgDlpZqELJoYmgRXH2vTxD II864sRlvVjSa7y7uGvU/p971qf/PGhjy4ca4WKXitRwpIwXkdPQ+kEOEqtirwaVSqyX Wx379sXh+zoJWLqwtair80kCFvS+2aBqdVUzKEjAGP0/1oJ1jG1aT5upo/zMowOx4K/Z OoA/tF4FdiKaVW/zwuUsF+6sMDwZgMrayE/jPVtI4dw8JlAo398PanMSIYaYm5Q+kQIj Gv76lNY95t/Cdl++F10BwB1h/kUl9BgFq5OaXAjd1d24NejZJ3iA+YEfSsoOvitd2wf/ 2s0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1+Ziv14g0JJYERomYNbosTJBQniZoL1nqQ2JhYv6bpY=; b=W8kZ3VtPAQkqc0alYBAEv2dwy5zFw3BUPfi35cJwB2WmzyKVxGcs8/qI/JCWmwsg0Z hrNdI3FGLPpry1ZnzdyWqdf5XRai0Qy45rVz0NU7GpGBcT+/N9FL4tinaAWIagrlR3Uu TSqpithG0sMWce1pSaxwBZNVnNyZVM423WQOUJ0p6Y6W78vYSfx0HBcLMVBM7a4JBwdQ HEGCUzoAhCXKqZDU7zhjkYvOJiTtzLZcezLFs2rn+euSs6lfoOl3JLNIwzHHoCvndL0R JQRnYK8gWGh7PckqLH5H+PMcJzIor8MfYjm4brYWd2Mw3JPtHeYZaePh6z92ggV6n2Q5 w3qg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533fvSqn9zVZXqEtTQVAT88FWmci9p3wrfrvAugvAXCw1cw6Z3v5 /p15dahgaC4tPujjxvqGPAr6mw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw7Te7fCr7+uQa0sUCJWC1sqssxylsLdSANmvYjf/Y4UR1gxtxpQC6Qios19NI8YSrCvE7fqQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9641:: with SMTP id d1mr9530521ios.123.1610737712323; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 11:08:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.30] ([65.144.74.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l13sm2931520ilm.79.2021.01.15.11.08.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 15 Jan 2021 11:08:31 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Bijan's rsrc generalisation + prep parts To: Pavel Begunkov , io-uring@vger.kernel.org, Bijan Mottahedeh References: From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <3d80407a-003b-f35a-1f58-d944aafe59e2@kernel.dk> Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 12:08:31 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org On 1/15/21 10:37 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote: > I guess we can agree that generic rsrc handling is a good thing to have, > even if we have only files at the moment. This consists of related > patches from the Bijan's longer series, doesn't include sharing and > buffer bits. I suggest to merge it first. It's approx half of the all > changes. > > Based on 5.12 with a few pathes from 5.11 cherry-pick to reduce merge > conflicts, because of merging/etc. may wait for a week or so for the > next rc before potentially being merged. This also addressed tricky > merge conflicts where it was applying and compiling well but still > buggy. > > Bijan, for the changed patches I also dropped your signed-off, so > please reply if you're happy with the new versions so we can > add it back. There are change logs (e.g. [did so]) in commit messages > of those. Thanks - I plan on merging this once -rc4 is cut, so we don't have any unnecessary merge conflicts. -- Jens Axboe