On 16/11/2019 01:15, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/15/19 2:38 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> On 16/11/2019 00:16, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 11/15/19 12:34 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> How about something like this? Should work (and be valid) to have any
>>>> sequence of timeout links, as long as there's something in front of it.
>>>> Commit message has more details.
>>>
>>> Updated below (missed the sqe free), easiest to check out the repo
>>> here:
>>>
>>> https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/log/?h=for-5.5/io_uring-post
>>>
>>> as that will show the couple of prep patches, too. Let me know what
>>> you think.
>>>
>>
>> Sure,
>>
>> BTW, found "io_uring: make io_double_put_req() use normal completion
>> path" in the tree. And it do exactly the same, what my patch was doing,
>> the one which "blowed" the link test :)
> 
> Hah yes, you are right, you never did resend it though. I'll get
> rid of the one I have, and replace with your original (but with
> the arguments fixed).
> 
Just keep yours, it's better :)

>> I'd add there "req->flags | REQ_F_FAIL_LINK" in-between failed
>> io_req_defer() and calling io_double_put_req(). (in 2 places)
>> Otherwise, even though a request failed, it will enqueue the rest
>> of its link with io_queue_async_work().
> 
> Good point, updating now.
> 

-- 
Pavel Begunkov