io-uring.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hao Xu <haoxu@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org, Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: fix tw list mess-up by adding tw while it's already in tw list
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 18:48:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <665861ee-7688-73ca-e553-177df4159cff@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6b9d818b-468e-e409-8dc1-9d4bd586635e@gmail.com>

在 2021/9/15 下午5:44, Pavel Begunkov 写道:
> On 9/12/21 5:23 PM, Hao Xu wrote:
>> For multishot mode, there may be cases like:
>> io_poll_task_func()
>> -> add_wait_queue()
>>                              async_wake()
>>                              ->io_req_task_work_add()
>>                              this one mess up the running task_work list
>>                              since req->io_task_work.node is in use.
>>
>> similar situation for req->io_task_work.fallback_node.
>> Fix it by set node->next = NULL before we run the tw, so that when we
>> add req back to the wait queue in middle of tw running, we can safely
>> re-add it to the tw list.
> 
> It may get screwed before we get to "node->next = NULL;",
> 
> -> async_wake()
>    -> io_req_task_work_add()
> -> async_wake()
>    -> io_req_task_work_add()
> tctx_task_work()
True, this may happen if there is second poll wait entry.
This pacth is for single wait entry only..
I'm thinking about the second poll entry issue, would be in a separate
patch.
> 
> 
>> Fixes: 7cbf1722d5fc ("io_uring: provide FIFO ordering for task_work")
>> Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <haoxu@linux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>>
>>   fs/io_uring.c | 11 ++++++++---
>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
>> index 30d959416eba..c16f6be3d46b 100644
>> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
>> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
>> @@ -1216,13 +1216,17 @@ static void io_fallback_req_func(struct work_struct *work)
>>   	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = container_of(work, struct io_ring_ctx,
>>   						fallback_work.work);
>>   	struct llist_node *node = llist_del_all(&ctx->fallback_llist);
>> -	struct io_kiocb *req, *tmp;
>> +	struct io_kiocb *req;
>>   	bool locked = false;
>>   
>>   	percpu_ref_get(&ctx->refs);
>> -	llist_for_each_entry_safe(req, tmp, node, io_task_work.fallback_node)
>> +	req = llist_entry(node, struct io_kiocb, io_task_work.fallback_node);
>> +	while (member_address_is_nonnull(req, io_task_work.fallback_node)) {
>> +		node = req->io_task_work.fallback_node.next;
>> +		req->io_task_work.fallback_node.next = NULL;
>>   		req->io_task_work.func(req, &locked);
>> -
>> +		req = llist_entry(node, struct io_kiocb, io_task_work.fallback_node);
>> +	}
>>   	if (locked) {
>>   		if (ctx->submit_state.compl_nr)
>>   			io_submit_flush_completions(ctx);
>> @@ -2126,6 +2130,7 @@ static void tctx_task_work(struct callback_head *cb)
>>   				locked = mutex_trylock(&ctx->uring_lock);
>>   				percpu_ref_get(&ctx->refs);
>>   			}
>> +			node->next = NULL;
>>   			req->io_task_work.func(req, &locked);
>>   			node = next;
>>   		} while (node);
>>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-15 10:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-12 16:23 [PATCH 0/2] poll fixes Hao Xu
2021-09-12 16:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: fix tw list mess-up by adding tw while it's already in tw list Hao Xu
2021-09-15  9:44   ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-15 10:48     ` Hao Xu [this message]
2021-09-26  9:48       ` Hao Xu
2021-09-29 11:16         ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-12 16:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: fix race between poll completion and cancel_hash insertion Hao Xu
2021-09-15  9:50   ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-15 10:49     ` Hao Xu
2021-09-15 10:12   ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-15 10:50     ` Hao Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=665861ee-7688-73ca-e553-177df4159cff@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=haoxu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: fix tw list mess-up by adding tw while it'\''s already in tw list' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).