archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <>
To: Xiaoguang Wang <>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: add missing sigmask restore in io_cqring_wait()
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 08:29:46 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On 9/14/21 8:28 AM, Xiaoguang Wang wrote:
> hi,
>> On 9/14/21 2:41 AM, Xiaoguang Wang wrote:
>>> Found this by learning codes.
>> Does look like a real bug. But how about we move the get_timespec() section
>> before the sigmask saving?
> Ok,  I thought about this method before :)

When you send a v2 with that, please do also write a proper commit message.
It should explain why the change is needed. Thanks!

Jens Axboe

      reply	other threads:[~2021-09-14 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-14  8:41 Xiaoguang Wang
2021-09-14 13:42 ` Jens Axboe
2021-09-14 14:28   ` Xiaoguang Wang
2021-09-14 14:29     ` Jens Axboe [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] io_uring: add missing sigmask restore in io_cqring_wait()' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).