From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: io-uring <io-uring@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v3 0/3] Add ability to save/restore iov_iter state
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 12:26:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wj3dsQMK4y-EeMD1Zyod7=Sv68UqrND-GYgHXx6wNRawA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8c7c8aa0-9591-a50f-35ee-de0037df858a@kernel.dk>
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 11:46 AM Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>
> The usual tests
> do end up hitting the -EAGAIN path quite easily for certain device
> types, but not the short read/write.
No way to do something like "read in file to make sure it's cached,
then invalidate caches from position X with POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED, then
do a read that crosses that cached/uncached boundary"?
To at least verify that "partly synchronous, but partly punted to async" case?
Or were you talking about some other situation?
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-15 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-15 16:29 [PATCHSET v3 0/3] Add ability to save/restore iov_iter state Jens Axboe
2021-09-15 16:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] iov_iter: add helper to save " Jens Axboe
2021-09-15 16:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] io_uring: use iov_iter state save/restore helpers Jens Axboe
2021-09-15 16:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] Revert "iov_iter: track truncated size" Jens Axboe
2021-09-15 18:32 ` [PATCHSET v3 0/3] Add ability to save/restore iov_iter state Linus Torvalds
2021-09-15 18:46 ` Jens Axboe
2021-09-15 19:26 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2021-09-15 19:40 ` Jens Axboe
2021-09-15 22:42 ` Jens Axboe
2021-09-16 1:15 ` Jens Axboe
2021-09-16 4:47 ` Al Viro
2021-09-16 16:10 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHk-=wj3dsQMK4y-EeMD1Zyod7=Sv68UqrND-GYgHXx6wNRawA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).