From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21BB8C49EA5 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 10:56:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09DAA613DA for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 10:56:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232213AbhFXK6T (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 06:58:19 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51762 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232146AbhFXK6T (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 06:58:19 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x72e.google.com (mail-qk1-x72e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55B7FC061574; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 03:56:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk1-x72e.google.com with SMTP id j184so13299360qkd.6; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 03:56:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/e/qEaOn8AYiDoFE2tjtFv5KON/qdc3GwFf003F+wGQ=; b=m252wepPDnEzZvnX4Xf0lUdlfC7C08RVGhwrJ6CVaoG3ancv89qBpCT6lEPAZiVPaK niGmfj8DudFylYtNwdkjuxXwxmr1W/uzbZEaJyUTa5MXdxK9b2CthH//dlxorPRChp7/ gtKjVvZ0F02kans264BuQgFe42hZNfAmO9x65rBLMa+5rhMX9NKZljJ7pOcXba7zhjsA aHLaa4NOZQY+Z2LOBYKsO1ij/NSE8JBH1O4VLpm661MsH8PgRM0rtIfJk9BgXvRJC2xX xweI7ZX9fQWwlLpZVJfkWQslBxwHvO98YRwCZUxBoDnhLuJ0Xw6WRBSUKv7paJT4/nPb YEcg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/e/qEaOn8AYiDoFE2tjtFv5KON/qdc3GwFf003F+wGQ=; b=RTOM6dWNHD+fo2e0cx+tmzQvag9rx1de7TLCd4foiiFL7SLKMRWuNEhxb/0jKFEG/d Eo7fvlO7JkBSTcKlPPCOHcPagG82gN74AlqLU4TC+86931rcVHIjP7GiJ9s2IUF/qX7O s8zwKnNWOxSJICo77mes2LDQd/vscCxZdi1eVFmGhCnDFP50pjNxpb9krVFAh0Vm6RFV EogMJBwC6P4noS7I0yIpEYQBj9c7zaDRPqReNzHWEbQVW3tPD/PHlETaovbC4f1wVr5I 3mc3cNL6DhFqIc55Xg5eCxnZWA7FYu/aC7twrI1HwwFsTESMs9VNFRUWVv116EKQshBO zKZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530yA4W6MRm0F4QsdQ2Zkc+9VftczBhgmORAMMVP3a1w+FtN6/Og fWb32X2uloBUWsKbOG0R+AkRCh3vwHGNz+aePIA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwrUJe7wgwtACcT00yohgNAguLrhFGEvA1SeraQeOrVHfAsqx3lTal2NoO2i8TbFcw024bcIyghh2JwkMc/Wec= X-Received: by 2002:a25:360d:: with SMTP id d13mr4063200yba.375.1624532159540; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 03:55:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210603051836.2614535-1-dkadashev@gmail.com> <0441443f-3f90-2d6c-20aa-92dc95a3f733@kernel.dk> <53863cb2-8d58-27a1-a6a4-be41f6f5c606@kernel.dk> <43b17e64-4c56-93d3-1724-2673d5b639f3@kernel.dk> In-Reply-To: <43b17e64-4c56-93d3-1724-2673d5b639f3@kernel.dk> From: Dmitry Kadashev Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 17:55:48 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] io_uring: add mkdir, [sym]linkat and mknodat support To: Jens Axboe Cc: Pavel Begunkov , Alexander Viro , Christian Brauner , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, io-uring Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 9:37 AM Jens Axboe wrote: > > On 6/22/21 11:49 PM, Dmitry Kadashev wrote: > > > > Jens, it seems that during this rebase you've accidentally squashed the > > "fs: update do_*() helpers to return ints" and > > "io_uring: add support for IORING_OP_SYMLINKAT" commits, so there is only the > > former one in your tree, but it actually adds the SYMLINKAT opcode to io uring > > (in addition to changing the helpers return types). > > Man, I wonder what happened there. I'll just drop the series, so when you > resend this one (hopefully soon if it's for 5.14...), just make it > against the current branch. Sure, I'll send v6 shortly -- Dmitry Kadashev