archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <>
To: Pavel Begunkov <>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: move iopoll reissue into regular IO path
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 19:14:01 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On 9/14/21 4:34 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> 230d50d448acb ("io_uring: move reissue into regular IO path")
> made non-IOPOLL I/O to not retry from ki_complete handler. Follow it
> steps and do the same for IOPOLL. Same problems, same implementation,
> same -EAGAIN assumptions.

This looks good to me. But I don't think it's against io_uring-5.15?
Trivial reject, but looks like -next to me.

Jens Axboe

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-15  1:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-14 22:34 Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-15  1:14 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2021-09-15  9:39   ` Pavel Begunkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] io_uring: move iopoll reissue into regular IO path' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).