IO-Uring Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 3/3] io_uring: batch get(ctx->ref) across submits
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2019 20:26:22 +0300
Message-ID: <b5c0e2ab-ded3-d06b-afda-e7a72f1368e4@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fef3a245-d2a2-23b3-ff03-3e05af19b752@kernel.dk>

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2970 bytes --]

On 21/12/2019 20:01, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 12/21/19 9:48 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> On 21/12/2019 19:38, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 12/21/19 9:20 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>>> On 21/12/2019 19:15, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>>>> Double account ctx->refs keeping number of taken refs in ctx. As
>>>>> io_uring gets per-request ctx->refs during submission, while holding
>>>>> ctx->uring_lock, this allows in most of the time to bypass
>>>>> percpu_ref_get*() and its overhead.
>>>>
>>>> Jens, could you please benchmark with this one? Especially for offloaded QD1
>>>> case. I haven't got any difference for nops test and don't have a decent SSD
>>>> at hands to test it myself. We could drop it, if there is no benefit.
>>>>
>>>> This rewrites that @extra_refs from the second one, so I left it for now.
>>>
>>> Sure, let me run a peak test, qd1 test, qd1+sqpoll test on
>>> for-5.6/io_uring, same branch with 1-2, and same branch with 1-3. That
>>> should give us a good comparison. One core used for all, and we're going
>>> to be core speed bound for the performance in all cases on this setup.
>>> So it'll be a good comparison.
>>>
>> Great, thanks!
> 
> For some reason, not seeing much of a change between for-5.6/io_uring
> and 1+2 and 1+2+3, it's about the same and results seem very stable.
> For reference, top of profile with 1-3 applied looks like this:

I see. I'll probably drop the last one, as it only complicates things.

My apologies for misleading terminology. Read-only QD1 (submit and
wait until the userspace completes it) obviously won't saturate a CPU.
Writes probably wouldn't as well (though, depends on HW). And it would be
better to say -- submit by one, complete in a bunch.
Just curious, what you used for testing? Is it fio?

> 
> +    3.92%  io_uring  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] blkdev_direct_IO
> +    3.87%  io_uring  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] blk_mq_get_request
> +    3.43%  io_uring  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] io_iopoll_getevents
> +    3.03%  io_uring  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] __slab_free
> +    2.87%  io_uring  io_uring          [.] submitter_fn
> +    2.79%  io_uring  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] io_submit_sqes
> +    2.75%  io_uring  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] bio_alloc_bioset
> +    2.70%  io_uring  [nvme_core]       [k] nvme_setup_cmd
> +    2.59%  io_uring  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] blk_mq_make_request
> +    2.46%  io_uring  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] io_prep_rw
> +    2.32%  io_uring  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] io_read
> +    2.25%  io_uring  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] blk_mq_free_request
> +    2.19%  io_uring  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] io_put_req
> +    2.06%  io_uring  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] kmem_cache_alloc
> +    2.01%  io_uring  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] generic_make_request_checks
> +    1.90%  io_uring  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] __sbitmap_get_word
> +    1.86%  io_uring  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] sbitmap_queue_clear
> +    1.85%  io_uring  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] io_issue_sqe
> 
> 

-- 
Pavel Begunkov


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply index

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-17 22:28 [PATCH 0/2] optimise ctx's refs grabbing in io_uring Pavel Begunkov
2019-12-17 22:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] pcpu_ref: add percpu_ref_tryget_many() Pavel Begunkov
2019-12-17 23:42   ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-18 16:26     ` Tejun Heo
2019-12-18 17:49       ` Dennis Zhou
2019-12-21 15:36         ` Pavel Begunkov
2019-12-17 22:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: batch getting pcpu references Pavel Begunkov
2019-12-17 23:21   ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-17 23:31     ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-18  9:25       ` Pavel Begunkov
2019-12-18  9:23     ` Pavel Begunkov
2019-12-18  0:02   ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-18 10:41     ` Pavel Begunkov
2019-12-21 16:15   ` [PATCH v2 0/3] optimise ctx's refs grabbing in io_uring Pavel Begunkov
2019-12-21 16:15     ` [PATCH v2 1/3] pcpu_ref: add percpu_ref_tryget_many() Pavel Begunkov
2019-12-21 16:15     ` [PATCH v2 2/3] io_uring: batch getting pcpu references Pavel Begunkov
2019-12-21 16:15     ` [PATCH RFC v2 3/3] io_uring: batch get(ctx->ref) across submits Pavel Begunkov
2019-12-21 16:20       ` Pavel Begunkov
2019-12-21 16:38         ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-21 16:48           ` Pavel Begunkov
2019-12-21 17:01             ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-21 17:26               ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2019-12-21 20:12       ` [PATCH v3 0/2] optimise ctx's refs grabbing in io_uring Pavel Begunkov
2019-12-21 20:12         ` [PATCH v3 1/2] pcpu_ref: add percpu_ref_tryget_many() Pavel Begunkov
2019-12-21 20:12         ` [PATCH v3 2/2] io_uring: batch getting pcpu references Pavel Begunkov
2019-12-21 21:56           ` Pavel Begunkov
2019-12-28 11:13         ` [PATCH v4 0/2] optimise ctx's refs grabbing in io_uring Pavel Begunkov
2019-12-28 11:13           ` [PATCH v4 1/2] pcpu_ref: add percpu_ref_tryget_many() Pavel Begunkov
2019-12-28 11:13           ` [PATCH v4 2/2] io_uring: batch getting pcpu references Pavel Begunkov
2019-12-28 11:15             ` Pavel Begunkov
2019-12-28 17:03               ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-28 18:37                 ` Pavel Begunkov
2019-12-30  3:33                   ` Brian Gianforcaro
2019-12-30 18:45                     ` Pavel Begunkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b5c0e2ab-ded3-d06b-afda-e7a72f1368e4@gmail.com \
    --to=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=dennis@kernel.org \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

IO-Uring Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/0 io-uring/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 io-uring io-uring/ https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring \
		io-uring@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index io-uring

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.io-uring


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git