io-uring.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* write / fsync ordering
@ 2020-01-28 10:31 Vitaliy Filippov
  2020-01-28 10:46 ` Pavel Begunkov
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Vitaliy Filippov @ 2020-01-28 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: io-uring

Hi everyone,

Can someone point out if io_uring may reorder write and fsync requests?

If I submit a write request and an fsync request at the same time, does  
that mean that fsync will sync that write request, or does it only sync  
completed requests?

-- 
With best regards,
   Vitaliy Filippov

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: write / fsync ordering
  2020-01-28 10:31 write / fsync ordering Vitaliy Filippov
@ 2020-01-28 10:46 ` Pavel Begunkov
  2020-01-28 10:55   ` Vitaliy Filippov
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2020-01-28 10:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vitaliy Filippov, io-uring, Jens Axboe

On 1/28/2020 1:31 PM, Vitaliy Filippov wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Can someone point out if io_uring may reorder write and fsync requests?
> 
> If I submit a write request and an fsync request at the same time, does
> that mean that fsync will sync that write request, or does it only sync
> completed requests?

Yes, it can reorder them. So, there are 2 ways:
- wait for the completion
- order the requests within io_uring

I'd recommend the ordering option by using IOSQE_IO_LINK, which
guarantees sequential execution of linked requests. There is also
IOSQE_IO_DRAIN, but it's rather inefficient.

-- 
Pavel Begunkov

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: write / fsync ordering
  2020-01-28 10:46 ` Pavel Begunkov
@ 2020-01-28 10:55   ` Vitaliy Filippov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Vitaliy Filippov @ 2020-01-28 10:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: io-uring, Jens Axboe, Pavel Begunkov

Thanks, I'll try it :)

> Yes, it can reorder them. So, there are 2 ways:
> - wait for the completion
> - order the requests within io_uring
>
> I'd recommend the ordering option by using IOSQE_IO_LINK, which
> guarantees sequential execution of linked requests. There is also
> IOSQE_IO_DRAIN, but it's rather inefficient.

-- 
With best regards,
   Vitaliy Filippov

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-01-28 10:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-01-28 10:31 write / fsync ordering Vitaliy Filippov
2020-01-28 10:46 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-01-28 10:55   ` Vitaliy Filippov

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).