iwd.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Prestwood <prestwoj@gmail.com>
To: iwd@lists.linux.dev
Cc: James Prestwood <prestwoj@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] wiphy: fix regdom change wiphy dump logic
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 13:41:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230510204153.715304-2-prestwoj@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230510204153.715304-1-prestwoj@gmail.com>

Certain drivers change the regulatory domain when the client roams.
First XX, then the country the roam target is using. Depending on the
timing the second regdom event can come while the first is still
dumping. This was not handled gracefully/nicely in IWD and it would
just issue another dump (it tries to cancel but if the dump started
there isn't anything that can be done). AFAIK the kernel should be
able to handle this but based on the behavior we saw it seems to not
be able to, or at least not reliably.

When the second dump comes in and GET_WIPHY is issued the kernel
stops replying to any messages which obviously causes IWD to completely
hang up waiting for various acks (set_station, set_key, etc.).

Now if another dump is ongoing (and cant be safely canceled) a flag
will be set when another dump is needed. The first dump will be
waited for and only once completed will another start. This also
ensures there is at most 1 pending dump when before any number of
dumps could be queued which is pointless since only the last dump
request matters.
---
 src/wiphy.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/wiphy.c b/src/wiphy.c
index 2db2d2cd..dbffa44e 100644
--- a/src/wiphy.c
+++ b/src/wiphy.c
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static int mac_randomize_bytes = 6;
 static char regdom_country[2];
 static uint32_t work_ids;
 static unsigned int wiphy_dump_id;
+static bool dump_queued;
 
 enum driver_flag {
 	DEFAULT_IF = 0x1,
@@ -123,6 +124,7 @@ struct wiphy {
 	bool work_in_callback;
 	unsigned int get_reg_id;
 	unsigned int dump_id;
+	bool dump_queued : 1;
 
 	bool support_scheduled_scan:1;
 	bool support_rekey_offload:1;
@@ -2066,18 +2068,23 @@ static void wiphy_setup_rm_enabled_capabilities(struct wiphy *wiphy)
 	 */
 }
 
+static void wiphy_dump_after_regdom(struct wiphy *wiphy);
+
 static void wiphy_dump_done(void *user_data)
 {
 	struct wiphy *wiphy = user_data;
 	const struct l_queue_entry *e;
 
-	/* This dump was canceled due to another dump */
-	if ((wiphy && !wiphy->dump_id) || (!wiphy && !wiphy_dump_id))
-		return;
-
 	if (wiphy) {
 		wiphy->dump_id = 0;
 
+		if (wiphy->dump_queued) {
+			wiphy->dump_queued = false;
+			wiphy_dump_after_regdom(wiphy);
+			return;
+		}
+
+		/* No other dumps queued, emit done */
 		WATCHLIST_NOTIFY(&wiphy->state_watches,
 				wiphy_state_watch_func_t, wiphy,
 				WIPHY_STATE_WATCH_EVENT_REGDOM_DONE);
@@ -2087,6 +2094,12 @@ static void wiphy_dump_done(void *user_data)
 
 	wiphy_dump_id = 0;
 
+	if (dump_queued) {
+		dump_queued = false;
+		wiphy_dump_after_regdom(NULL);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	for (e = l_queue_get_entries(wiphy_list); e; e = e->next) {
 		wiphy = e->data;
 
@@ -2160,38 +2173,48 @@ static void wiphy_dump_callback(struct l_genl_msg *msg,
 	}
 }
 
-static bool wiphy_cancel_last_dump(struct wiphy *wiphy)
+static void wiphy_dump_after_regdom(struct wiphy *wiphy)
 {
-	unsigned int id = 0;
+	const struct l_queue_entry *e;
+	struct l_genl_msg *msg;
+	unsigned int *id = NULL;
 
-	/*
-	 * Zero command ID to signal that wiphy_dump_done doesn't need to do
-	 * anything.
-	 */
-	if (wiphy && wiphy->dump_id) {
-		id = wiphy->dump_id;
-		wiphy->dump_id = 0;
-	} else if (!wiphy && wiphy_dump_id) {
-		id = wiphy_dump_id;
-		wiphy_dump_id = 0;
-	}
+	if (wiphy)
+		id = &wiphy->dump_id;
+	else
+		id = &wiphy_dump_id;
 
-	if (id) {
-		l_debug("Canceling pending regdom wiphy dump (%s)",
+	if (*id) {
+		/*
+		 * If the dump hasn't hit the kernel we can safely cancel it.
+		 * Otherwise set the dump_queued flag and once the current dump
+		 * has completed, another will start. This also ensures there is
+		 * only at most 1 pending dump.
+		 */
+		if (!l_genl_family_request_sent(nl80211, *id)) {
+			l_debug("Canceling pending regdom wiphy dump (%s)",
 					wiphy ? wiphy->name : "global");
 
-		l_genl_family_cancel(nl80211, id);
+			l_genl_family_cancel(nl80211, *id);
+
+			/*
+			 * If there is already dump queued (dump_queued=true)
+			 * the destroy callback will end up starting another
+			 * dump. If this happens nothing more needs to be done.
+			 */
+			if (*id)
+				return;
+		} else if (wiphy) {
+			wiphy->dump_queued = true;
+			return;
+		} else {
+			dump_queued = true;
+			return;
+		}
 	}
 
-	return id != 0;
-}
-
-static void wiphy_dump_after_regdom(struct wiphy *wiphy)
-{
-	const struct l_queue_entry *e;
-	struct l_genl_msg *msg;
-	unsigned int id;
-	bool no_start_event;
+	l_debug("Dumping wiphy after regdom change (%s)",
+			wiphy ? wiphy->name : "global");
 
 	msg = l_genl_msg_new_sized(NL80211_CMD_GET_WIPHY, 128);
 
@@ -2199,37 +2222,22 @@ static void wiphy_dump_after_regdom(struct wiphy *wiphy)
 		l_genl_msg_append_attr(msg, NL80211_ATTR_WIPHY, 4, &wiphy->id);
 
 	l_genl_msg_append_attr(msg, NL80211_ATTR_SPLIT_WIPHY_DUMP, 0, NULL);
-	id = l_genl_family_dump(nl80211, msg, wiphy_dump_callback,
+	*id = l_genl_family_dump(nl80211, msg, wiphy_dump_callback,
 						wiphy, wiphy_dump_done);
-	if (!id) {
+	if (!*id) {
 		l_error("Wiphy information dump failed");
 		l_genl_msg_unref(msg);
 		return;
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * Another update while dumping wiphy. This next dump should supercede
-	 * the first and not result in a DONE event until this new dump is
-	 * finished. This is because the disabled frequencies are in an unknown
-	 * state and could cause incorrect behavior by any watchers.
-	 */
-	no_start_event = wiphy_cancel_last_dump(wiphy);
-
 	/* Limited dump so just emit the event for this wiphy */
 	if (wiphy) {
-		wiphy->dump_id = id;
-
-		if (no_start_event)
-			return;
-
 		WATCHLIST_NOTIFY(&wiphy->state_watches,
 				wiphy_state_watch_func_t, wiphy,
 				WIPHY_STATE_WATCH_EVENT_REGDOM_STARTED);
 		return;
 	}
 
-	wiphy_dump_id = id;
-
 	/* Otherwise for a global regdom change notify for all wiphy's */
 	for (e = l_queue_get_entries(wiphy_list); e; e = e->next) {
 		struct wiphy *w = e->data;
@@ -2237,9 +2245,6 @@ static void wiphy_dump_after_regdom(struct wiphy *wiphy)
 		if (w->self_managed)
 			continue;
 
-		if (no_start_event)
-			continue;
-
 		WATCHLIST_NOTIFY(&w->state_watches, wiphy_state_watch_func_t,
 				w, WIPHY_STATE_WATCH_EVENT_REGDOM_STARTED);
 	}
-- 
2.25.1


  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-10 20:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-10 20:41 [PATCH 0/1] Fix wiphy regdom logic James Prestwood
2023-05-10 20:41 ` James Prestwood [this message]
2023-05-10 20:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] wiphy: fix regdom change wiphy dump logic James Prestwood
2023-05-10 20:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] station: fix reentrant FT wiphy radio work insertion James Prestwood
2023-05-10 20:43 ` [PATCH 0/1] Fix wiphy regdom logic James Prestwood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230510204153.715304-2-prestwoj@gmail.com \
    --to=prestwoj@gmail.com \
    --cc=iwd@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).