From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 17:42:27 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Message-ID: <20170814164227.GJ20805@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20170814125411.22604-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <20170814125411.22604-3-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <20170814152950.GT6321@e103592.cambridge.arm.com> <20170814155002.GV6321@e103592.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH 02/30] ARM: assembler: introduce adr_l, ldr_l and str_l macros To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Nicolas Pitre , Dave Martin , Mark Rutland , Kees Cook , Arnd Bergmann , Marc Zyngier , Kernel Hardening , Tony Lindgren , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Thomas Garnier , Matt Fleming List-ID: On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 05:22:39PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 14 August 2017 at 17:18, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Aug 2017, Dave Martin wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 04:38:02PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > >> > That's a trick, actually, which I failed to add a comment for. > > > > Shame shame shame ! > > > >> > We use .arm sections in the thumb2 kernel, and using these macros > >> > there would result in the wrong offset to be used. Adding the .w > >> > suffix forces an error in the assembler which even results in a fairly > >> > meaningful error message complaining about using .w in ARM code. > >> > >> Ewww... I think it'd be best to add a comment explaining that. > > > > Absolutely! > > > > Yeah, mea culpa. > > But if people have better ideas how to avoid this situation, I am all ears. Have you tested building an ARMv7M kernel with your patches - ARMv7M is Thumb only, so can't contain any ARM code. If not, please try mps2_defconfig. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up