From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@intel.com>
Cc: "kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com"
<kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
"luto@kernel.org" <luto@kernel.org>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
"keescook@chromium.org" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"tytso@mit.edu" <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/entry/64: randomize kernel stack offset upon system call
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 16:15:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190208151502.GC32494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2236FBA76BA1254E88B949DDB74E612BA4BB7580@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 01:20:09PM +0000, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 02:15:49PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> I can measure the impact with rdtsc(), I think it is *very* small.
> Btw, what should be the good measurement test?
> I am not that happy with just looping on fopen-fclose, too
> much noise.
IIRC amluto had a nice micro-bench for 'pure' syscall overhead
somewhere.
Something like getpid/gettid in a loop should work fairly well, that's a
really light syscall to make.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-08 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-08 12:15 [RFC PATCH] Early version of thread stack randomization Elena Reshetova
2019-02-08 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH] x86/entry/64: randomize kernel stack offset upon system call Elena Reshetova
2019-02-08 13:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-08 13:20 ` Reshetova, Elena
2019-02-08 14:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-09 11:13 ` Reshetova, Elena
2019-02-09 18:25 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-02-11 6:39 ` Reshetova, Elena
2019-02-11 15:54 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-02-12 10:16 ` Perla, Enrico
2019-02-14 7:52 ` Reshetova, Elena
2019-02-19 14:47 ` Jann Horn
2019-02-20 22:20 ` Kees Cook
2019-02-21 6:37 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-02-21 13:20 ` Jann Horn
2019-02-21 15:49 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-02-20 22:15 ` Kees Cook
2019-02-20 22:53 ` Kees Cook
2019-02-21 23:29 ` Kees Cook
2019-02-27 11:03 ` Reshetova, Elena
2019-02-21 9:35 ` Perla, Enrico
2019-02-21 17:23 ` Kees Cook
2019-02-21 17:48 ` Perla, Enrico
2019-02-21 19:18 ` Kees Cook
2019-02-20 21:51 ` Kees Cook
2019-02-08 15:15 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-02-09 11:38 ` Reshetova, Elena
2019-02-09 12:09 ` Greg KH
2019-02-11 6:05 ` Reshetova, Elena
2019-02-08 16:34 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-02-20 22:03 ` Kees Cook
2019-02-08 21:28 ` Kees Cook
2019-02-11 12:47 ` Reshetova, Elena
2019-02-20 22:04 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190208151502.GC32494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=elena.reshetova@intel.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--subject='Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/entry/64: randomize kernel stack offset upon system call' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).