From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Tianlin Li <tli@digitalocean.com>
Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/misc: have the callers of set_memory_*() check the return value
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 15:57:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201912171557.507D9D2@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191217194528.16461-1-tli@digitalocean.com>
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 01:45:28PM -0600, Tianlin Li wrote:
> Right now several architectures allow their set_memory_*() family of
> functions to fail, but callers may not be checking the return values.
> If set_memory_*() returns with an error, call-site assumptions may be
> infact wrong to assume that it would either succeed or not succeed at
> all. Ideally, the failure of set_memory_*() should be passed up the
> call stack, and callers should examine the failure and deal with it.
>
> Need to fix the callers and add the __must_check attribute. They also
> may not provide any level of atomicity, in the sense that the memory
> protections may be left incomplete on failure. This issue likely has a
> few steps on effects architectures:
> 1)Have all callers of set_memory_*() helpers check the return value.
> 2)Add __must_check to all set_memory_*() helpers so that new uses do
> not ignore the return value.
> 3)Add atomicity to the calls so that the memory protections aren't left
> in a partial state.
>
> This series is part of step 1. Make sram driver check the return value of
> set_memory_*().
>
> Signed-off-by: Tianlin Li <tli@digitalocean.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
-Kees
> ---
> drivers/misc/sram-exec.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/sram-exec.c b/drivers/misc/sram-exec.c
> index d054e2842a5f..cb57ac6ab4c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/sram-exec.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/sram-exec.c
> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ void *sram_exec_copy(struct gen_pool *pool, void *dst, void *src,
> unsigned long base;
> int pages;
> void *dst_cpy;
> + int ret;
>
> mutex_lock(&exec_pool_list_mutex);
> list_for_each_entry(p, &exec_pool_list, list) {
> @@ -104,16 +105,28 @@ void *sram_exec_copy(struct gen_pool *pool, void *dst, void *src,
>
> mutex_lock(&part->lock);
>
> - set_memory_nx((unsigned long)base, pages);
> - set_memory_rw((unsigned long)base, pages);
> + ret = set_memory_nx((unsigned long)base, pages);
> + if (ret)
> + goto error_out;
> + ret = set_memory_rw((unsigned long)base, pages);
> + if (ret)
> + goto error_out;
>
> dst_cpy = fncpy(dst, src, size);
>
> - set_memory_ro((unsigned long)base, pages);
> - set_memory_x((unsigned long)base, pages);
> + ret = set_memory_ro((unsigned long)base, pages);
> + if (ret)
> + goto error_out;
> + ret = set_memory_x((unsigned long)base, pages);
> + if (ret)
> + goto error_out;
>
> mutex_unlock(&part->lock);
>
> return dst_cpy;
> +
> +error_out:
> + mutex_unlock(&part->lock);
> + return NULL;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sram_exec_copy);
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
Kees Cook
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-17 23:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-17 19:45 [PATCH] drivers/misc: have the callers of set_memory_*() check the return value Tianlin Li
2019-12-17 23:57 ` Kees Cook [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201912171557.507D9D2@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tli@digitalocean.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).