kernel-hardening.lists.openwall.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Hector Marco-Gisbert <hecmargi@upv.es>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	x86@kernel.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/7] binfmt_elf: Update READ_IMPLIES_EXEC logic for modern CPUs
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 11:30:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200210193049.64362-1-keescook@chromium.org> (raw)

Hi,

This is a refresh of my earlier attempt to fix READ_IMPLIES_EXEC. I think
it incorporates the feedback from v2, and I've now added a selftest. This
series is for x86, arm, and arm64; I'd like it to go via -tip, though,
just to keep this change together with the selftest. To that end, I'd like
to collect Acks from the respective architecture maintainers. (Note that
most other architectures don't suffer from this problem. e.g. powerpc's
behavior appears to already be correct. MIPS may need adjusting but the
history of CPU features and toolchain behavior is very unclear to me.)

Repeating the commit log from later in the series:


The READ_IMPLIES_EXEC work-around was designed for old toolchains that
lacked the ELF PT_GNU_STACK marking under the assumption that toolchains
that couldn't specify executable permission flags for the stack may not
know how to do it correctly for any memory region.

This logic is sensible for having ancient binaries coexist in a system
with possibly NX memory, but was implemented in a way that equated having
a PT_GNU_STACK marked executable as being as "broken" as lacking the
PT_GNU_STACK marking entirely. Things like unmarked assembly and stack
trampolines may cause PT_GNU_STACK to need an executable bit, but they
do not imply all mappings must be executable.

This confusion has led to situations where modern programs with explicitly
marked executable stack are forced into the READ_IMPLIES_EXEC state when
no such thing is needed. (And leads to unexpected failures when mmap()ing
regions of device driver memory that wish to disallow VM_EXEC[1].)

In looking for other reasons for the READ_IMPLIES_EXEC behavior, Jann
Horn noted that glibc thread stacks have always been marked RWX (until
2003 when they started tracking the PT_GNU_STACK flag instead[2]). And
musl doesn't support executable stacks at all[3]. As such, no breakage
for multithreaded applications is expected from this change.

[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190418055759.GA3155@mellanox.com
[2] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=54ee14b3882
[3] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190423192534.GN23599@brightrain.aerifal.cx


-Kees


v3:
 - split steps in to distinct patches
 - include arm32 and arm64/compat
 - add selftests to validate behavior
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190424203408.GA11386@beast/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190423181210.GA2443@beast/

Kees Cook (7):
  x86/elf: Add table to document READ_IMPLIES_EXEC
  x86/elf: Split READ_IMPLIES_EXEC from executable GNU_STACK
  x86/elf: Disable automatic READ_IMPLIES_EXEC for 64-bit address spaces
  arm32/64, elf: Add tables to document READ_IMPLIES_EXEC
  arm32/64, elf: Split READ_IMPLIES_EXEC from executable GNU_STACK
  arm64, elf: Disable automatic READ_IMPLIES_EXEC for 64-bit address
    spaces
  selftests/exec: Add READ_IMPLIES_EXEC tests

 arch/arm/kernel/elf.c                         |  27 +++-
 arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h                  |  23 +++-
 arch/x86/include/asm/elf.h                    |  22 +++-
 fs/compat_binfmt_elf.c                        |   5 +
 tools/testing/selftests/exec/Makefile         |  42 +++++-
 .../selftests/exec/read_implies_exec.c        | 121 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/exec/strip-gnu-stack-bits.c     |  34 +++++
 .../testing/selftests/exec/strip-gnu-stack.c  |  69 ++++++++++
 8 files changed, 336 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/exec/read_implies_exec.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/exec/strip-gnu-stack-bits.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/exec/strip-gnu-stack.c

-- 
2.20.1


             reply	other threads:[~2020-02-10 19:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-10 19:30 Kees Cook [this message]
2020-02-10 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] x86/elf: Add table to document READ_IMPLIES_EXEC Kees Cook
2020-02-10 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] x86/elf: Split READ_IMPLIES_EXEC from executable GNU_STACK Kees Cook
2020-02-10 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] x86/elf: Disable automatic READ_IMPLIES_EXEC for 64-bit address spaces Kees Cook
2020-02-10 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] arm32/64, elf: Add tables to document READ_IMPLIES_EXEC Kees Cook
2020-02-12  9:27   ` Catalin Marinas
2020-02-10 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] arm32/64, elf: Split READ_IMPLIES_EXEC from executable GNU_STACK Kees Cook
2020-02-12  9:27   ` Catalin Marinas
2020-02-10 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] arm64, elf: Disable automatic READ_IMPLIES_EXEC for 64-bit address spaces Kees Cook
2020-02-12  9:28   ` Catalin Marinas
2020-02-10 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] selftests/exec: Add READ_IMPLIES_EXEC tests Kees Cook
2020-02-11 18:11   ` shuah
2020-02-11 19:25     ` Kees Cook
2020-02-11 21:06       ` shuah
2020-02-11 23:54         ` Kees Cook
2020-02-12  0:02           ` shuah
2020-02-11 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] binfmt_elf: Update READ_IMPLIES_EXEC logic for modern CPUs Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200210193049.64362-1-keescook@chromium.org \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=hecmargi@upv.es \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).