From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D4CC43331 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:39:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mother.openwall.net (mother.openwall.net [195.42.179.200]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7806620838 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:39:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="siSm447I" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7806620838 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel-hardening-return-18327-kernel-hardening=archiver.kernel.org@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 3178 invoked by uid 550); 31 Mar 2020 11:39:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kernel-hardening-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Received: (qmail 5798 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2020 23:15:08 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1585610096; bh=VVSNPfwNTi/eewRuFYhE6zHWE9KPNO3Iea9w8iAWJQU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=siSm447IUzxXtgfrXMT+dm2UB+eOcmg2IHY8EYAANBKNIAAlzAe3U4hgLktrF2Nl0 Jj+C/sJZu0iMwZ9MwXpCOB6xmTvpUstfmu8CIgfvaT+eJiBiOgkJdKf16h2iNK/hEF 1nUyulakvnSeA5XBjFaYwTfmhRJCU+qwebq1dzVA= Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:14:56 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Will Deacon Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , Jann Horn , Kees Cook , Maddie Stone , Marco Elver , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , kernel-team@android.com, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 05/21] list: Comment missing WRITE_ONCE() in __list_del() Message-ID: <20200330231456.GA19865@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> References: <20200324153643.15527-1-will@kernel.org> <20200324153643.15527-6-will@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200324153643.15527-6-will@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 03:36:27PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > Although __list_del() is called from the RCU list implementation, it > omits WRITE_ONCE() when updating the 'prev' pointer for the 'next' node. > This is reasonable because concurrent RCU readers only access the 'next' > pointers. > > Although it's obvious after reading the code, add a comment. > > Cc: Paul E. McKenney > Cc: Peter Zijlstra > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon OK, I will take the easy one. ;-) Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney > --- > include/linux/list.h | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/list.h b/include/linux/list.h > index 4d9f5f9ed1a8..ec1f780d1449 100644 > --- a/include/linux/list.h > +++ b/include/linux/list.h > @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ static inline void list_add_tail(struct list_head *new, struct list_head *head) > */ > static inline void __list_del(struct list_head * prev, struct list_head * next) > { > + /* RCU readers don't read the 'prev' pointer */ > next->prev = prev; > WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, next); > } > -- > 2.20.1 >