From: "PaX Team" <pageexec@freemail.hu>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
x86@kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com>,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] init: create cmdline param to disable readonly
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 01:37:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5656545F.29919.10A1CE2B@pageexec.freemail.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448494286-16029-2-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org>
On 25 Nov 2015 at 15:31, Kees Cook wrote:
> + rodata= [KNL]
> + on Mark read-only kernel memory as read-only (default).
> + off Leave read-only kernel memory writable for debugging.
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA
> +bool disable_mark_readonly;
__initdata?
> +static int __init set_debug_rodata(char *str)
> +{
> + if (!str)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (!strncmp(str, "on", 2))
> + disable_mark_readonly = false;
> + else if (!strncmp(str, "off", 3))
> + disable_mark_readonly = true;
maybe it's just me but the double negatives make my head spin,
perhaps call it enable_rodata instead (so that the variable name
isn't so disconnected from the option name)?
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +__setup("rodata=", set_debug_rodata);
> +
> +static void mark_readonly(void)
> +{
> + if (disable_mark_readonly)
> + pr_info("Kernel read-only memory marking disabled.\n");
> + else
> + mark_rodata_ro();
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-26 0:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-25 23:31 [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v2 0/4] introduce post-init read-only memory Kees Cook
2015-11-25 23:31 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v2 1/4] init: create cmdline param to disable readonly Kees Cook
2015-11-26 0:37 ` PaX Team [this message]
2015-11-26 0:44 ` Greg KH
2015-11-26 7:51 ` [kernel-hardening] " Ingo Molnar
2015-11-30 21:52 ` Kees Cook
2015-11-30 22:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-30 22:34 ` Kees Cook
2015-12-01 7:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-12-01 7:19 ` Heiko Carstens
2015-11-25 23:31 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v2 2/4] introduce post-init read-only memory Kees Cook
2015-11-26 0:15 ` [kernel-hardening] " PaX Team
2015-11-30 22:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-12-09 19:35 ` Kees Cook
2015-11-25 23:31 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v2 3/4] lkdtm: verify that __ro_after_init works correctly Kees Cook
2015-11-25 23:31 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v2 4/4] x86, vdso: mark vDSO read-only after init Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5656545F.29919.10A1CE2B@pageexec.freemail.hu \
--to=pageexec@freemail.hu \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=minipli@googlemail.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=re.emese@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).