From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6C2C35E01 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:50:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mother.openwall.net (mother.openwall.net [195.42.179.200]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4DA121556 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:50:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="G7bWyZbH" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E4DA121556 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel-hardening-return-17921-kernel-hardening=archiver.kernel.org@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 5698 invoked by uid 550); 25 Feb 2020 18:50:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kernel-hardening-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Received: (qmail 5666 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2020 18:50:09 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=nvwGkkcwwig4eCR4m0+EXyPalZCNu0nCU8n4Iqik970=; b=G7bWyZbHZX8L5mx1qmuUrJ6R/u1VcW6191mW+YfJDBC8HLgDFKfKHWQEOoEJoVhkXn W/y6CCVqFL92NYn57nNRjyHA6lwYbRoweC1yYGHTkJzL53mymmUpJksjTWZ7ySbaPrRB n0dyGnxfMmOFoTSoRJbqDT3MGEuqUxVvZXV12P4m3+0oJWHi3DH5TMF+x/W1qg0hNMxA CLweY4F1EeybVJFQ04jKbevHMx8Vcg43jgMKOzPQ4W+7RIFDB5lRmOdZqHKK6pq4BKkF NJ9ve8xEqDSWGj1UXvCZkB5iZd0pmON/92SSjvdIELk2bdaMvOd6OKLXHoTzYJLCvTa+ zcpg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=nvwGkkcwwig4eCR4m0+EXyPalZCNu0nCU8n4Iqik970=; b=PL6B4Mkzc4Lnk5sk1jt7SrVq5hu23keR/PupC88D1odgNY2VrQ0+Wr8VuvQSFxWnzs iQuUScyhiFIpW0NiU8Lwd2BLUED2TqEdUp6DvHe2c2a+zKTu30Qmu3SzflbRhjDAnwOL 56HsCOYlxQOrMamoeKJLwBy7f32F8dmScy47ju/mbvEpnWaEyYN2l1W7ClkI+sIanJdc 7CyFMukUvEa1RPtTa3CzrnQqkj6XOkayuPVMCC+sAAvJEqXtUhiwDmOnERbnwyr3KJZ9 4z7ERzRik4rG/GGZWizAqy1q7dsWecpll4W5C5DgB8E+qjWeMMkqC5uLQmh5aHXhfw0D 1lnw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXAgh6lqdINAMwqTrcUStXUqWCyroDxf1rUpqRR0IQp+b6e5HSZ q0OTVIu/6OuUToXIApd5kPs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwqCzAhzlldh7y2QteC8HJxHmiV+T+MgbEcZee4Qfdqy017TQ2Ol+QM4KbM9t0bb8tGyUsHwA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bc45:: with SMTP id t5mr56453991plz.239.1582656596777; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:49:56 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v14 00/10] Landlock LSM To: =?UTF-8?Q?Micka=c3=abl_Sala=c3=bcn?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Al Viro , Andy Lutomirski , Arnd Bergmann , Casey Schaufler , Greg Kroah-Hartman , James Morris , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Michael Kerrisk , =?UTF-8?Q?Micka=c3=abl_Sala=c3=bcn?= , "Serge E . Hallyn" , Shuah Khan , Vincent Dagonneau , kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org References: <20200224160215.4136-1-mic@digikod.net> From: J Freyensee Message-ID: <6df3e6b1-ffd1-dacf-2f2d-7df8e5aca668@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:49:52 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200224160215.4136-1-mic@digikod.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-GB On 2/24/20 8:02 AM, Mickaël Salaün wrote: > ## Syscall > > Because it is only tested on x86_64, the syscall is only wired up for > this architecture. The whole x86 family (and probably all the others) > will be supported in the next patch series. General question for u.  What is it meant "whole x86 family will be supported".  32-bit x86 will be supported? Thanks, Jay