From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 03/12] __wr_after_init: Core and default arch References: <20190214112849.GM32494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <6e9ec71c-ee75-9b1e-9ff8-a3210030e85d@gmail.com> <20190215085736.GO32494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> From: Igor Stoppa Message-ID: <7cfb5d06-96a6-41a0-9f57-d9df1204f45e@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 17:15:38 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190215085736.GO32494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Igor Stoppa , Andy Lutomirski , Nadav Amit , Matthew Wilcox , Kees Cook , Dave Hansen , Mimi Zohar , Thiago Jung Bauermann , Ahmed Soliman , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 15/02/2019 10:57, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Where are the comments and Changelog notes ? How is an arch maintainer > to be aware of this requirement when adding support for his/her arch? Yes, it will be fixed in the next revision. I've added comment to the core wr_assign function and also to the changelogs for the patches enabling it on x86_64 and arm64, respectively. Should I add mention of it also in the documentation? -- igor