From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181206083257.9596-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <201812091807.4emRkZ7L%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <20181209103740.GB30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: From: Kees Cook Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 13:26:26 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: smp: add support for per-task stack canaries Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" To: Russell King Cc: kbuild test robot , Ard Biesheuvel , kbuild-all@01.org, LKML , linux-arm-kernel , Emese Revfy , Arnd Bergmann , Laura Abbott , Kernel Hardening List-ID: On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 2:34 PM Kees Cook wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 2:38 AM Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 06:28:11PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > > > Hi Ard, > > > > > > I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: > > > > Hi, > > > > This looks to me like a false warning - how can a patch touching arch > > code affect the result of lib/test_ubsan.c? Please can you double- > > check this result? > > Yeah, no idea. Do you want me to toss this into the ARM patch queue? > If not, I can this through the gcc-plugin tree. Since the ARM changes are relatively small, and it adds a new plugin, I'll take this via the gcc-plugins tree for -next now. Please yell if this should be done differently. Thanks! -- Kees Cook