kernel-hardening.lists.openwall.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com"
	<kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: introduce post-init read-only memory
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:44:07 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jKe5hZtrUJ7SJ2WTcJvKXftgkAkPjxmvoVjewbC3Kqg9Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXNe5Ow0cxLACzVpx3HdR_b_XCB3_VUtsAphVjCQpRZwA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
> On Nov 24, 2015 1:38 PM, "Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>> One of the easiest ways to protect the kernel from attack is to reduce
>> the internal attack surface exposed when a "write" flaw is available. By
>> making as much of the kernel read-only as possible, we reduce the
>> attack surface.
>>
>> Many things are written to only during __init, and never changed
>> again. These cannot be made "const" since the compiler will do the wrong
>> thing (we do actually need to write to them). Instead, move these items
>> into a memory region that will be made read-only during mark_rodata_ro()
>> which happens after all kernel __init code has finished.
>>
>> This introduces __read_only as a way to mark such memory, and adds some
>> documentation about the existing __read_mostly marking.
>
> Obligatory bikeshed:  __ro_after_init, please.  It's barely longer,
> and it directly explains what's going on.  __read_only makes me think
> that it's really read-only and could, for example, actually be in ROM.

I'm fine with that. Anyone else want to chime in before I send a v2?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS & Brillo Security

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-25  0:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-24 21:38 [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 0/2] introduce post-init read-only memory Kees Cook
2015-11-24 21:38 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 1/2] x86: " Kees Cook
2015-11-25  0:34   ` [kernel-hardening] " Andy Lutomirski
2015-11-25  0:44     ` Kees Cook [this message]
2015-11-25  0:54       ` Michael Ellerman
2015-11-25 15:03         ` Kees Cook
2015-11-25 23:05           ` Michael Ellerman
2015-11-25 23:32             ` Kees Cook
2015-11-24 21:38 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 2/2] x86, vdso: mark vDSO read-only after init Kees Cook
2015-11-25  9:13 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 0/2] introduce post-init read-only memory Mathias Krause
2015-11-25 10:06   ` Clemens Ladisch
2015-11-25 11:14     ` PaX Team
2015-11-26 15:23     ` Daniel Micay
2015-11-25 11:05   ` PaX Team
2015-11-26  8:54     ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-26  9:57       ` PaX Team
2015-11-26 10:42         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-26 12:14           ` PaX Team
2015-11-27  8:05             ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-27 15:29               ` PaX Team
2015-11-27 16:30                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-11-29  8:08                 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-29 11:15                   ` PaX Team
2015-11-29 15:39                     ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-29 18:05                       ` Mathias Krause
2015-11-30  8:01                         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-26 16:11       ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-11-27  7:59         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-27 18:00           ` Linus Torvalds
2015-11-27 18:03             ` Linus Torvalds
2015-11-27 20:03             ` Kees Cook
2015-11-27 20:09               ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-11-29  8:05                 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-30 21:14                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-11-30 21:33                     ` Kees Cook
2015-11-30 21:38                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-11-30 21:43                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-11-25 17:26   ` Kees Cook
2015-11-25 17:31   ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-11-25 18:54     ` Kees Cook
2015-11-25 19:06       ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGXu5jKe5hZtrUJ7SJ2WTcJvKXftgkAkPjxmvoVjewbC3Kqg9Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).