From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,GAPPY_SUBJECT, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB6DC0650E for ; Sat, 6 Jul 2019 15:03:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mother.openwall.net (mother.openwall.net [195.42.179.200]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 69E9420856 for ; Sat, 6 Jul 2019 15:03:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="rh/FqlVe" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 69E9420856 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel-hardening-return-16365-kernel-hardening=archiver.kernel.org@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 13962 invoked by uid 550); 6 Jul 2019 15:03:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kernel-hardening-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Received: (qmail 13927 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2019 15:03:10 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=boVbp9ZUpDsf//+FdnJqiUZCUcTK245wDcHd7jIjrpY=; b=rh/FqlVekhxhsGpxulSZ7913KgIi6gqoFF4i/RNbOKBumEHd/qP8oFyX+UMcwSBJ/K eJbwXN4Ov/ueoIt4Oyi19u68UVz6gWVl32e1YjWfUsFB+HhwINCxXsiVdhbRDT3gbdiG 5ibSk2q5E+W34FIfKzIclMIaC9eqyeGf8flkt1UTZCjuuU8xyABLpmZVy9kQW38Wcd47 gAN4OKTn4B+qQpI+Fdb0r7ze2FAi8FFmV7f4mtLyNxY5j9rWNMTHzsbte1amZOAaiclM 2DjSHrq+GVNYO2PJo+dpnRZ5GGJt2TrAWtORL250xGp3SE0C7nVC/Ze8vY2ybOEgpvg+ BqLA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=boVbp9ZUpDsf//+FdnJqiUZCUcTK245wDcHd7jIjrpY=; b=SkAJ5XRBTjUjUCwemAckbOxXo8QS1CuYbwA8K6ApYTH/3jeWiAKWHZH/Qzp96mkwZ2 KJTQ/2XQhc5iU+Ou5mqBaw3+7D5Z4UZTNRO+q3DFgOrbMzcyjvGEQRdXi/OwmrMMlJp5 HW77g+fXhqb8weG6wYyWxAdJzS7esCmhdNVLF3E/Mlezkgn0YouN1kz8Zi+VSzwYR0Ob yIQNSRQ3F7E2ITwz39aUHFccNAVhAJThk55fVYN+7cDLYsxoXIRacbJT/+W8SnqrxF/a udpghOukIVES8jtTL0wcdphVhd0E5A7zS1Vg2+BYbOY9u42etIkl9M84s/oEu919r1vt 6iEg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWQO7b3c0jae3NRSCd9+AVlSHfy9KLvJLpnZ30cPbGtkQWFnxg6 6G1KbVWknq84eoA9hNcYKwM/qiwtlcOOBis9mXw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy2UcPtMHw6LxYEegmwXcbc6qsKnlfXOceq6+ohw3DYNqy1gXgyu+nij430oPjMdmSFDPXMk206/IR43gK04QA= X-Received: by 2002:a02:b710:: with SMTP id g16mr10876342jam.88.1562425378023; Sat, 06 Jul 2019 08:02:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1562410493-8661-1-git-send-email-s.mesoraca16@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Salvatore Mesoraca Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2019 17:02:46 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] S.A.R.A. a new stacked LSM To: Jordan Glover Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" , Brad Spengler , Casey Schaufler , Christoph Hellwig , James Morris , Jann Horn , Kees Cook , PaX Team , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Thomas Gleixner Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" You are right. I just forgot to remove that paragraph from the cover letter. My bad. Thank you for noticing that :) Il giorno sab 6 lug 2019 alle ore 16:33 Jordan Glover ha scritto: > > On Saturday, July 6, 2019 10:54 AM, Salvatore Mesoraca wrote: > > > S.A.R.A. is meant to be stacked but it needs cred blobs and the procattr > > interface, so I temporarily implemented those parts in a way that won't > > be acceptable for upstream, but it works for now. I know that there > > is some ongoing work to make cred blobs and procattr stackable, as soon > > as the new interfaces will be available I'll reimplement the involved > > parts. > > I thought all stacking pieces for minor LSM were merged in Linux 5.1. > Is there still something missing or is this comment out-fo-date? > > Jordan