kernel-hardening.lists.openwall.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Sandeep Patil <sspatil@android.com>,
	Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Alexander Popov <alpopov@ptsecurity.com>,
	Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
	Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] kbuild: Implement Clang's stack initialization
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 17:05:13 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQpm5Tz_Fo0rSq00emB7BLnfYB-+mwXd9GiMKAqKCfkrA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190410161612.18545-4-keescook@chromium.org>

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 1:16 AM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL turns on stack initialization based on
> -ftrivial-auto-var-init in Clang builds and on
> -fplugin-arg-structleak_plugin-byref-all in GCC builds.

Is CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL wired up to GCC plugin in any way?
I could not understand it from the code.


>
> -ftrivial-auto-var-init is a Clang flag that provides trivial
> initializers for uninitialized local variables, variable fields and
> padding.
>
> It has three possible values:
>   pattern - uninitialized locals are filled with a fixed pattern
>     (mostly 0xAA on 64-bit platforms, see https://reviews.llvm.org/D54604
>     for more details) likely to cause crashes when uninitialized value is
>     used;
>   zero (it's still debated whether this flag makes it to the official
>     Clang release) - uninitialized locals are filled with zeroes;
>   uninitialized (default) - uninitialized locals are left intact.
>
> The proposed config builds the kernel with
> -ftrivial-auto-var-init=pattern when selected.
>
> Developers have the possibility to opt-out of this feature on a
> per-variable basis by using __attribute__((uninitialized)).
>
> Co-developed-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
>  Makefile                   |  5 +++++
>  security/Kconfig.hardening | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index c0a34064c574..a7d9c6cd0267 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -745,6 +745,11 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS      += -fomit-frame-pointer
>  endif
>  endif
>
> +# Initialize all stack variables with a pattern, if desired.
> +ifdef CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS  += -ftrivial-auto-var-init=pattern
> +endif
> +
>  DEBUG_CFLAGS   := $(call cc-option, -fno-var-tracking-assignments)
>
>  ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO
> diff --git a/security/Kconfig.hardening b/security/Kconfig.hardening
> index 9942d9869864..d744e20140b4 100644
> --- a/security/Kconfig.hardening
> +++ b/security/Kconfig.hardening
> @@ -19,9 +19,13 @@ config GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK
>
>  menu "Memory initialization"
>
> +config CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT
> +       def_bool $(cc-option,-ftrivial-auto-var-init=pattern)
> +
>  choice
>         prompt "Initialize kernel stack variables at function entry"
>         depends on CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT || GCC_PLUGINS
> +       default INIT_STACK_ALL if CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT

Why should this be enabled by default?
Ins't it a performance regression
since it inserts instructions in function prologue?





-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-11  8:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-10 16:16 [PATCH 0/3] Kconfig: Refactor memory initialization hardening Kees Cook
2019-04-10 16:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] Kconfig: Create "kernel hardening" config area Kees Cook
2019-04-11  8:50   ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-04-11 16:59     ` Kees Cook
2019-04-10 16:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] kbuild: Move stackleak config to Kconfig.hardening Kees Cook
2019-04-10 16:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] kbuild: Implement Clang's stack initialization Kees Cook
2019-04-11  8:05   ` Masahiro Yamada [this message]
2019-04-11 17:07     ` Kees Cook
2019-04-11  7:59 ` [PATCH 0/3] Kconfig: Refactor memory initialization hardening Masahiro Yamada

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAK7LNAQpm5Tz_Fo0rSq00emB7BLnfYB-+mwXd9GiMKAqKCfkrA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
    --cc=alpopov@ptsecurity.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=kcc@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=re.emese@gmail.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=sspatil@android.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).