From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Sandeep Patil <sspatil@android.com>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Alexander Popov <alpopov@ptsecurity.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] kbuild: Implement Clang's stack initialization
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 17:05:13 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQpm5Tz_Fo0rSq00emB7BLnfYB-+mwXd9GiMKAqKCfkrA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190410161612.18545-4-keescook@chromium.org>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 1:16 AM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL turns on stack initialization based on
> -ftrivial-auto-var-init in Clang builds and on
> -fplugin-arg-structleak_plugin-byref-all in GCC builds.
Is CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL wired up to GCC plugin in any way?
I could not understand it from the code.
>
> -ftrivial-auto-var-init is a Clang flag that provides trivial
> initializers for uninitialized local variables, variable fields and
> padding.
>
> It has three possible values:
> pattern - uninitialized locals are filled with a fixed pattern
> (mostly 0xAA on 64-bit platforms, see https://reviews.llvm.org/D54604
> for more details) likely to cause crashes when uninitialized value is
> used;
> zero (it's still debated whether this flag makes it to the official
> Clang release) - uninitialized locals are filled with zeroes;
> uninitialized (default) - uninitialized locals are left intact.
>
> The proposed config builds the kernel with
> -ftrivial-auto-var-init=pattern when selected.
>
> Developers have the possibility to opt-out of this feature on a
> per-variable basis by using __attribute__((uninitialized)).
>
> Co-developed-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
> Makefile | 5 +++++
> security/Kconfig.hardening | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index c0a34064c574..a7d9c6cd0267 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -745,6 +745,11 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fomit-frame-pointer
> endif
> endif
>
> +# Initialize all stack variables with a pattern, if desired.
> +ifdef CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -ftrivial-auto-var-init=pattern
> +endif
> +
> DEBUG_CFLAGS := $(call cc-option, -fno-var-tracking-assignments)
>
> ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO
> diff --git a/security/Kconfig.hardening b/security/Kconfig.hardening
> index 9942d9869864..d744e20140b4 100644
> --- a/security/Kconfig.hardening
> +++ b/security/Kconfig.hardening
> @@ -19,9 +19,13 @@ config GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK
>
> menu "Memory initialization"
>
> +config CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT
> + def_bool $(cc-option,-ftrivial-auto-var-init=pattern)
> +
> choice
> prompt "Initialize kernel stack variables at function entry"
> depends on CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT || GCC_PLUGINS
> + default INIT_STACK_ALL if CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT
Why should this be enabled by default?
Ins't it a performance regression
since it inserts instructions in function prologue?
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-11 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-10 16:16 [PATCH 0/3] Kconfig: Refactor memory initialization hardening Kees Cook
2019-04-10 16:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] Kconfig: Create "kernel hardening" config area Kees Cook
2019-04-11 8:50 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-04-11 16:59 ` Kees Cook
2019-04-10 16:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] kbuild: Move stackleak config to Kconfig.hardening Kees Cook
2019-04-10 16:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] kbuild: Implement Clang's stack initialization Kees Cook
2019-04-11 8:05 ` Masahiro Yamada [this message]
2019-04-11 17:07 ` Kees Cook
2019-04-11 7:59 ` [PATCH 0/3] Kconfig: Refactor memory initialization hardening Masahiro Yamada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAK7LNAQpm5Tz_Fo0rSq00emB7BLnfYB-+mwXd9GiMKAqKCfkrA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
--cc=alpopov@ptsecurity.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kcc@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=re.emese@gmail.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=sspatil@android.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).