From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com>,
Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gcc-plugins: structleak: Generalize to all variable types
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 21:27:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2xC3OVckPnweSjor3AH5LpSzichKxAjkAcgXDtCf0QmQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190212180441.15340-2-keescook@chromium.org>
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 7:08 PM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> This adjusts structleak to also work with non-struct types when they
> are passed by reference, since those variables may leak just like
> anything else. This is exposed via an improved set of Kconfig options.
> (This does mean structleak is slightly misnamed now.)
>
> Building with CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_BYREF_ALL should give the
> kernel complete initialization coverage of all stack variables passed
> by reference, including padding (see lib/test_stackinit.c).
>
> Using CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_VERBOSE to count added initializations
> under defconfig:
>
> ..._BYREF: 5945 added initializations
> ..._BYREF_ALL: 16606 added initializations
>
> There is virtually no change to text+data size (both have less than 0.05%
> growth):
I just resumed my randconfig build testing after a longer break, and found
a regression for stack usage that I bisected to your change. It shows up in a
variety of files depending on the configuration, so far the worst one is the
configuration at https://pastebin.com/UK54qbKa that leads to
../drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c: In function 'stv090x_start_search':
../drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c:1595:1: error: the frame size
of 5320 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
../drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c: In function 'stv090x_optimize_track':
../drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c:3090:1: error: the frame size
of 5872 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
../drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c: In function 'stv090x_algo':
../drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c:3431:1: error: the frame size
of 5144 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
}
At least for this specific file, I also see a significant (though not alarming)
increase in code size:
text data bss dec hex filename
179196 4632 256 184084 2cf14
obj-x86/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x-before.o
216740 4632 256 221628 361bc
obj-x86/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x-after.o
Part of the problem here is definitely interaction with the asan-stack
sanitizer. Changing asan-stack=1 to asan-stack=0, it looks a lot
better:
../drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c: In function 'stv090x_start_search':
../drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c:1595:1: warning: the frame
size of 120 bytes is larger than 20 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
../drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c: In function 'stv090x_optimize_track':
../drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c:3090:1: warning: the frame
size of 168 bytes is larger than 20 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
../drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c: In function 'stv090x_algo':
../drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c:3431:1: warning: the frame
size of 192 bytes is larger than 20 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
text data bss dec hex filename
184061 4632 256 188949 2e215
obj-x86/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.o
I get similar results with asan-stack=1 but without your plugin, only
the combination of the two has the explosive stack size growth.
I can help analyze this further, but maybe you can have a look first,
there might be something obvious when you read the input to the
plugin.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-28 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-12 18:04 [PATCH 0/2] gcc-plugins: structleak: Generalize to all variable types Kees Cook
2019-02-12 18:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Kees Cook
2019-02-28 20:27 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2019-03-02 9:04 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-03-02 15:43 ` Kees Cook
2019-03-02 22:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-03-04 17:32 ` Kees Cook
2019-03-11 23:05 ` Alexander Popov
2019-03-13 19:01 ` Kees Cook
2019-02-12 18:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] lib: Introduce test_stackinit module Kees Cook
2019-03-11 10:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-04-23 22:42 ` Kees Cook
2019-02-15 17:38 ` [PATCH 0/2] gcc-plugins: structleak: Generalize to all variable types Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAK8P3a2xC3OVckPnweSjor3AH5LpSzichKxAjkAcgXDtCf0QmQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=alex.popov@linux.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=re.emese@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).