From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190117003259.23141-1-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> <20190117003259.23141-7-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20190117003259.23141-7-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 12:27:23 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/17] x86/alternative: use temporary mm for text poking Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" To: Rick Edgecombe Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Ingo Molnar , LKML , X86 ML , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov , Nadav Amit , Dave Hansen , Peter Zijlstra , linux_dti@icloud.com, linux-integrity , LSM List , Andrew Morton , Kernel Hardening , Linux-MM , Will Deacon , Ard Biesheuvel , Kristen Carlson Accardi , "Dock, Deneen T" , Nadav Amit , Kees Cook , Dave Hansen , Masami Hiramatsu List-ID: On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 4:33 PM Rick Edgecombe wrote: > > From: Nadav Amit > > text_poke() can potentially compromise the security as it sets temporary > PTEs in the fixmap. These PTEs might be used to rewrite the kernel code > from other cores accidentally or maliciously, if an attacker gains the > ability to write onto kernel memory. i think this may be sufficient, but barely. > + pte_clear(poking_mm, poking_addr, ptep); > + > + /* > + * __flush_tlb_one_user() performs a redundant TLB flush when PTI is on, > + * as it also flushes the corresponding "user" address spaces, which > + * does not exist. > + * > + * Poking, however, is already very inefficient since it does not try to > + * batch updates, so we ignore this problem for the time being. > + * > + * Since the PTEs do not exist in other kernel address-spaces, we do > + * not use __flush_tlb_one_kernel(), which when PTI is on would cause > + * more unwarranted TLB flushes. > + * > + * There is a slight anomaly here: the PTE is a supervisor-only and > + * (potentially) global and we use __flush_tlb_one_user() but this > + * should be fine. > + */ > + __flush_tlb_one_user(poking_addr); > + if (cross_page_boundary) { > + pte_clear(poking_mm, poking_addr + PAGE_SIZE, ptep + 1); > + __flush_tlb_one_user(poking_addr + PAGE_SIZE); > + } In principle, another CPU could still have the old translation. Your mutex probably makes this impossible, but it makes me nervous. Ideally you'd use flush_tlb_mm_range(), but I guess you can't do that with IRQs off. Hmm. I think you should add an inc_mm_tlb_gen() here. Arguably, if you did that, you could omit the flushes, but maybe that's silly. If we start getting new users of use_temporary_mm(), we should give some serious thought to the SMP semantics. Also, you're using PAGE_KERNEL. Please tell me that the global bit isn't set in there. --Andy