kernel-hardening.lists.openwall.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Cc: John Cotton Ericson <mail@johnericson.me>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
	Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net>,
	Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: Leveraging pidfs for process creation without fork
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 01:41:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YQNYs+BKenJHBMSP@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210729142415.qovpzky537zkg3dp@wittgenstein>

On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 04:24:15PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 12:37:57PM -0400, John Cotton Ericson wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I was excited to learn about about pidfds the other day, precisely in hopes
> > that it would open the door to such a "sane process creation API". I
> > searched the LKML, found this thread, and now hope to rekindle the
> > discussion; my apologies if there has been more discussion since that I
> 
> Yeah, I haven't forgotten this discussion. A proposal is on my todo list
> for this year. So far I've scheduled some time to work on this in the
> fall.

Keep in mind that quite a few places in kernel/exit.c very much rely upon the
lack of anything outside of thread group adding threads into it.  Same for
fs/exec.c.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-30  1:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-01 17:47 forkat(int pidfd), execveat(int pidfd), other awful things? Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-02-01 17:51 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-02-01 18:20 ` Christian Brauner
2021-02-01 18:29 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-02  9:23   ` David Laight
2021-07-28 16:37     ` Leveraging pidfs for process creation without fork John Cotton Ericson
2021-07-29 14:24       ` Christian Brauner
2021-07-29 14:54         ` John Ericson
2021-07-30  1:41         ` Al Viro [this message]
2021-07-31 22:11           ` John Ericson
2021-07-31 22:42             ` Al Viro
2021-08-02 12:19               ` Christian Brauner
2021-08-03  6:00                 ` John Cotton Ericson
2021-02-01 18:32 ` forkat(int pidfd), execveat(int pidfd), other awful things? Casey Schaufler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YQNYs+BKenJHBMSP@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=christian.brauner@canonical.com \
    --cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=jann@thejh.net \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mail@johnericson.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).