From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 16:53:28 +0000 Subject: Re: net-PA Semi: Deletion of unnecessary checks before the function call "pci_dev_put" Message-Id: <1417539208.1841.1.camel@sipsolutions.net> List-Id: References: <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net> <530A086E.8010901@users.sourceforge.net> <530A72AA.3000601@users.sourceforge.net> <530B5FB6.6010207@users.sourceforge.net> <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net> <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <547BC5AD.6090500@users.sourceforge.net> (sfid-20141201_023451_153915_6CFB474F) <1417465745.28610.0.camel@sipsolutions.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Julia Lawall Cc: SF Markus Elfring , Lino Sanfilippo , Olof Johansson , netdev@vger.kernel.org, backports@vger.kernel.org, LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, "Luis R. Rodriguez" On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 21:34 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > > So this kind of evolution is no problem for the (automated) backports > > using the backports project - although it can be difficult to detect > > such a thing is needed. > > That is exactly the problem... I'm not convinced though that it should stop such progress in mainline. johannes