From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D04C11F64 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 19:29:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4B261159 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 19:29:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236532AbhF1Tby (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 15:31:54 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47262 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236526AbhF1Tbx (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 15:31:53 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x62f.google.com (mail-pl1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E16E2C061766 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 12:29:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id m17so9516608plx.7 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 12:29:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZJ6u2k6/dJhmtJ+a/0MHT0Ak2qWLb/bcwrC6FvorPSQ=; b=n8uh5BL5JUgY4xOLSY/QFzLUx4h8+eiR4ud8YSIx+mmGU6c63SdHzwx80jLkxQ9F0X cXGjXnat+9O9uXio1+z/Ddfrr4DgcSmFCVAscxsdku5pADBHOYwd0tRP0Hko3vanwFOZ wGTHwxwKuKFVFh3JknoR1UpDe9WJ3gcTeZd/o= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZJ6u2k6/dJhmtJ+a/0MHT0Ak2qWLb/bcwrC6FvorPSQ=; b=okXdijnrmWhKq1wmmFosfBP+Oj3KnmrPf2BASpRgFwARSzzYsfBYUwYIBVxEkKdVAb 6SpCsL3vYbbmpwHb+3c21ZRyffefy6epiM1e3/rKIM9jn/viWtdgUZFB/FlUINwDf7eY HcwC9a6aW8uck+//t2Ibfs0T6qkeq4QuqkKtoAJIy5wdNQBor0MUmab+oxAzQHHhBY8D ahSjEuPleKFAE1CrL24Wf9MhQRNLSE/AW3xJtyzPHVa9rTW7n+9CKQZf0RF5l0zKUgnj eeRwJ96ujnMdPYHOuirNUoMJ6pFralMd/Qi3QbSf8llEnoeWTKbLaGh7elkM/1TJmHf3 Nl6g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530lqQWKVup1I9RldpS/XsHrViksKDaEx3muN2683iL+87kfMm8P zt7gbqcuaMpbrDhwvyYdzQGsEg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz1uj/MMaj6X3iG0Y158vKYXBq1/oub7G1h8/NnL5WdpAzImby8uj7C6j+B72ZmmUCSgoaJQw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:720b:b029:113:19d7:2da7 with SMTP id ba11-20020a170902720bb029011319d72da7mr23791449plb.55.1624908566889; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 12:29:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n12sm14973518pfu.5.2021.06.28.12.29.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 12:29:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Kees Cook To: Sami Tolvanen , clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, Lukas Bulwahn , Bill Wendling , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Kees Cook , Nathan Chancellor , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Nick Desaulniers Subject: Re: [PATCH] pgo: rectify comment to proper kernel-doc syntax Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 12:29:19 -0700 Message-Id: <162490855630.2191955.7188154193447975503.b4-ty@chromium.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <20210628055947.6948-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> References: <20210628055947.6948-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 07:59:47 +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote: > The command ./scripts/kernel-doc -none kernel/pgo/pgo.h warns: > > kernel/pgo/pgo.h:112: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'struct llvm_prf_value_node_data ' > > This is due to a slightly invalid use of kernel-doc syntax for the comment > of this struct, that must have probably just slipped through refactoring > and review before. > > [...] Applied to for-next/clang/features, thanks! [1/1] pgo: rectify comment to proper kernel-doc syntax https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/6a0544606ec7 -- Kees Cook