From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shawn Guo Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:02:23 +0000 Subject: Re: ARM: imx6: add missing put_device() call in imx6q_suspend_init() Message-Id: <20200623110222.GX30139@dragon> List-Id: References: <2ab2cc9f-c720-75ca-e20c-0e4236ff45fd@huawei.com> <1542979d-f7f6-bcf1-53c3-22b7c076ddc7@web.de> <20200623073220.GV30139@dragon> <5300cb30-2243-9bfe-125c-96e720cd1f29@web.de> In-Reply-To: <5300cb30-2243-9bfe-125c-96e720cd1f29@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: Markus Elfring Cc: kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-imx@nxp.com, Yu Kuai , Anson Huang , Fabio Estevam , Russell King , Sascha Hauer , Yi Zhang , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 09:48:52AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > >>>> Do you find a previous update suggestion useful? > >>>> > >>>> ARM: imx6: Add missing put_device() call in imx6q_suspend_init() > >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/5acd7308-f6e1-4b1e-c744-bb2e5fdca1be@web.de/ > >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1151158/ > >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/11/9/125 > >> … > >>> It is useful indeed. > … > >>> Any idea why these pathes didn't get applied ? > >> > >> I can make assumptions about the reasons for the possibly questionable handling > >> of such patches. > > > > Markus, > > > > Could you resend it to my kernel.org address? > > You can get relevant information from the referenced message archive interfaces, > can't you? Well, I'm asking you to resend to make sure the following: - Use correct maintainer mailbox address. - You still care about the patch. - The patch applies to v5.8-rc. Shawn