From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 16:52:06 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] use semicolons rather than commas to separate statements Message-Id: <20201005165206.GA2440@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu" List-Id: References: <160132172369.55460.9237357219623604216.b4-ty@kernel.org> <20200929113745.GB4799@sirena.org.uk> <20201001110150.GA6715@sirena.org.uk> <20201003191501.o56tqq63d2buq5ox@chatter.i7.local> <20201003193137.z2bpwzlz5a66kkex@chatter.i7.local> <9ab43333596f08abbbbbf1fa8cdf1ded4b65af2a.camel@perches.com> In-Reply-To: <9ab43333596f08abbbbbf1fa8cdf1ded4b65af2a.camel@perches.com> To: Joe Perches Cc: Konstantin Ryabitsev , Julia Lawall , tools@linux.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jerome Brunet , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, David Lechner , Valdis =?utf-8?Q?Kl=C4=93tnieks?= , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, Martin Blumenstingl , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Gleixner , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Neil Armstrong --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 12:43:13PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sat, 2020-10-03 at 15:31 -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > > I'm worried that this can get unwieldy for series of 50 patches where 4= 9=20 > > got applied. Would the following be better: =2E.. > > A subset of these patches was applied to > >=20 > > https://... > >=20 > > Thanks! > >=20 > > [5/18] regmap: debugfs: > > commit: It's definitely an improvement but TBH I'm not sure how much it's going to help those struggling to parse the current messages. > > I think this is a better solution than potentially flooding everyone=20 > > with 49 emails. I would tend to prefer cutting down on mail volume but I don't think there's any way to keep everyone happy with this stuff. > I think it would be better to reply individually as > the likelihood that the maintainer skips just a few > patches of a large series is relatively low. It's not at all unusual for driver updates to both add new DT bindings (either for entirely new drivers or new properties/compatibles for existing drivers) and also have DTS file updates using those bindings, these go via separate trees. --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl97TzUACgkQJNaLcl1U h9DI9Qf/dhOghwYGEqexRQ644ACI4w9j7rH7Z4qsTYl+rdj06q5wrcOFnyypjB/j N/Qx3llsTbG0UagMLyGeuFi5bzhxALnrvmrbv8cBPI0/3jS2D7u22cD5m6toS+Tp f08tgo7VkjfkB3QCZn9A7XGAPq3bEvoaCvFalxqGt0FPUw5kVGrboVa1dgJCzRL/ CtWXDQfG9vy5ZVs0cY+s+O9yvAbrZJyMPaKkeoa7dwnqzOQz1Ga4ADtUZsUWyieK wuCO/HNGdf77CmSbOuG6BMrWi5SGoEtRmVO+w5NmYO1yOfnooSih3uWDR4H01xVg 3zFgbOHRZMIwAEzTfTqRA4vzPMXRQQ== =wwYC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu--