From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:19:50 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: check for idle core Message-Id: <20201021121950.GF2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> List-Id: References: <1603211879-1064-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr> <20201021112038.GC32041@suse.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Julia Lawall Cc: Mel Gorman , Ingo Molnar , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Valentin Schneider , Gilles Muller , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , viresh.kumar@linaro.org, srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 01:56:55PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > Prior to 5.8, my machine was using intel_pstate and had few background > tasks. Thus the problem wasn't visible in practice. Starting with 5.8 > the kernel decided that intel_cpufreq would be more appropriate, which > introduced kworkers every 0.004 seconds on all cores. That still doesn't make any sense. Are you running the legacy on-demand thing or something? Rafael, Srinivas, Viresh, how come it defaults to that?