From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] staging: rtl8188eu: remove RT_TRACE and DBG_88E prints from usb_ops_linux.c
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 10:19:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210607071958.GN1955@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210605165858.3175-6-martin@kaiser.cx>
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 06:58:55PM +0200, Martin Kaiser wrote:
> @@ -464,14 +403,8 @@ u32 usb_read_port(struct adapter *adapter, u32 addr, struct recv_buf *precvbuf)
> precvbuf);/* context is precvbuf */
>
> err = usb_submit_urb(purb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> - if ((err) && (err != (-EPERM))) {
> - RT_TRACE(_module_hci_ops_os_c_, _drv_err_,
> - ("cannot submit rx in-token(err=0x%.8x), URB_STATUS =0x%.8x",
> - err, purb->status));
> - DBG_88E("cannot submit rx in-token(err = 0x%08x),urb_status = %d\n",
> - err, purb->status);
> + if ((err) && (err != (-EPERM)))
> ret = _FAIL;
Not related to your patch but why is -EPERM treated differently? It's
not immediately clear that -EPERM is even something that usb_submit_urb()
returns...
> - }
>
> return ret;
> }
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-07 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-05 16:58 [PATCH 1/9] staging: rtl8188eu: remove unused RT_PRINT_DATA macro Martin Kaiser
2021-06-05 16:58 ` [PATCH 2/9] staging: rtl8188eu: remove RT_TRACE and DBG_88E prints from rtw_cmd.c Martin Kaiser
2021-06-05 16:58 ` [PATCH 3/9] staging: rtl8188eu: refactor rtw_lps_ctrl_wk_cmd Martin Kaiser
2021-06-05 16:58 ` [PATCH 4/9] staging: rtl8188eu: make rtw_free_recvframe return void Martin Kaiser
2021-06-05 16:58 ` [PATCH 5/9] staging: rtl8188eu: simplify rtw_get_wireless_stats Martin Kaiser
2021-06-05 16:58 ` [PATCH 6/9] staging: rtl8188eu: remove RT_TRACE and DBG_88E prints from usb_ops_linux.c Martin Kaiser
2021-06-07 7:19 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2021-06-05 16:58 ` [PATCH 7/9] staging: rtl8188eu: use existing define for ethernet header len Martin Kaiser
2021-06-05 16:58 ` [PATCH 8/9] staging: rtl8188eu: use standard kthread handling Martin Kaiser
2021-06-05 16:58 ` [PATCH 9/9] staging: rtl8188eu: remove unused function parameter Martin Kaiser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210607071958.GN1955@kadam \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=martin@kaiser.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).