From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CFADC49EAB for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:21:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382936143C for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:21:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231442AbhFYKXl (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 06:23:41 -0400 Received: from mail.netfilter.org ([217.70.188.207]:51340 "EHLO mail.netfilter.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231182AbhFYKXi (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 06:23:38 -0400 Received: from netfilter.org (unknown [90.77.255.23]) by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E1FF607EB; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 12:21:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 12:21:13 +0200 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Walter Harms Cc: Colin King , Jozsef Kadlecsik , Florian Westphal , "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , "netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org" , "coreteam@netfilter.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] netfilter: nf_tables: Fix dereference of null pointer flow Message-ID: <20210625102113.GB32352@salvia> References: <20210624195718.170796-1-colin.king@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 10:06:26AM +0000, Walter Harms wrote: > hi Colin, > most free_something_functions accept NULL > these days, perhaps it would be more efficient > to add a check in nft_flow_rule_destroy(). > There is a chance that this will catch the same > mistake in future also. I'm fine with Colin patch. Thanks.