From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 14:10:40 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH resent] ALSA: emu10k1: Deletion of unnecessary checks before three function calls Message-Id: <54578CE0.1090201@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------020403040306060201090104" List-Id: References: <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net> <530A086E.8010901@users.sourceforge.net> <530A72AA.3000601@users.sourceforge.net> <530B5FB6.6010207@users.sourceforge.net> <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net> <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.so urceforge.net> <54567788.9060008@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: To: Takashi Iwai Cc: Jaroslav Kysela , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, trivial@kernel.org, Coccinelle This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020403040306060201090104 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Your patch can't be applied cleanly due to your MUA breaking the > lines. Please fix your MUA setup, or use an attachment if it's > impossible, and resend the patch. Thanks for your feedback. Does this example show a conflict between long comments like "snd_emu10k1_ctl_private_free( ... *kctl)" after patch ranges and line length limitation for email eventually? > Also, try to align the subject line with the relevant commits. See > "git log sound/pci/emu10k1" I have attached my update suggestion with a slightly different commit title as before. Is this variant acceptable? Regards, Markus --------------020403040306060201090104 Content-Type: text/x-patch; name="0001-ALSA-emu10k1-Deletion-of-unnecessary-checks-before-t.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename*0="0001-ALSA-emu10k1-Deletion-of-unnecessary-checks-before-t.pa"; filename*1="tch" >From 23bb7bd1325b7c9cc81761db3ebf3ea19f85338d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Markus Elfring Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 14:54:36 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ALSA: emu10k1: Deletion of unnecessary checks before three function calls The functions kfree(), release_firmware() and snd_util_memhdr_free() test whether their argument is NULL and then return immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed. This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring --- sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1_main.c | 9 +++------ sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c | 3 +-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1_main.c b/sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1_main.c index 2292697..b4458a6 100644 --- a/sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1_main.c +++ b/sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1_main.c @@ -1289,10 +1289,8 @@ static int snd_emu10k1_free(struct snd_emu10k1 *emu) } if (emu->emu1010.firmware_thread) kthread_stop(emu->emu1010.firmware_thread); - if (emu->firmware) - release_firmware(emu->firmware); - if (emu->dock_fw) - release_firmware(emu->dock_fw); + release_firmware(emu->firmware); + release_firmware(emu->dock_fw); if (emu->irq >= 0) free_irq(emu->irq, emu); /* remove reserved page */ @@ -1301,8 +1299,7 @@ static int snd_emu10k1_free(struct snd_emu10k1 *emu) (struct snd_util_memblk *)emu->reserved_page); emu->reserved_page = NULL; } - if (emu->memhdr) - snd_util_memhdr_free(emu->memhdr); + snd_util_memhdr_free(emu->memhdr); if (emu->silent_page.area) snd_dma_free_pages(&emu->silent_page); if (emu->ptb_pages.area) diff --git a/sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c b/sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c index 745f062..eb5c0ab 100644 --- a/sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c +++ b/sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c @@ -777,8 +777,7 @@ static void snd_emu10k1_ctl_private_free(struct snd_kcontrol *kctl) kctl->private_value = 0; list_del(&ctl->list); kfree(ctl); - if (kctl->tlv.p) - kfree(kctl->tlv.p); + kfree(kctl->tlv.p); } static int snd_emu10k1_add_controls(struct snd_emu10k1 *emu, -- 2.1.3 --------------020403040306060201090104--