From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 11:48:37 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] kernel-audit: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the function call "audit_log_e
Message-Id: <54688F15.9070703@users.sourceforge.net>
List-Id: <kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1402251014170.2080@hadrien>
 <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1402251840450.7035@hadrien>
 <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402252117150.2047@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402262129250.2221@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <54687F1A.1010809@users.sourceforge.net>
 <20141116111023.GA4905@mwanda> <20141116111446.GA4956@mwanda>
In-Reply-To: <20141116111446.GA4956@mwanda>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr

> An example of a bug introduced is here:
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/3/505

It seems that we try to clarify a different interpretation of "bugs", don't we?

It is an usual software development challenge to decide on the best source code places
where to put input parameter validation (and when it can be omitted), isn't it?

Regards,
Markus