From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: walter harms Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:39:37 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] PM-wakeup: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the function call "wakeup_source_ Message-Id: <546C9D99.3080001@bfs.de> List-Id: References: <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <546C7E75.9080301@users.sourceforge.net> <20141119120915.GM4905@mwanda> <546C9319.4040205@bfs.de> <20141119130553.GN4956@mwanda> In-Reply-To: <20141119130553.GN4956@mwanda> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Dan Carpenter Cc: SF Markus Elfring , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Len Brown , Pavel Machek , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall Am 19.11.2014 14:05, schrieb Dan Carpenter: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 01:54:49PM +0100, walter harms wrote: >> device_wakeup_detach returns dev->power.wakeup what is never NULL in this case. >> (not visible here but a few line before exactly this is checked) > > Huh? I don't see a NULL check. > > I think you may be confusing "dev->power.can_wakeup" with > "dev->power.wakeup"? > > mea culpa, you are right dev->power.can_wakeup != dev->power.wakeup therefore device_wakeup_detach(dev) CAN return NULL re, wh