From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:21:36 +0000 Subject: Re: thunderbolt: Deletion of unnecessary checks before the function call "ring_free" Message-Id: <546F2E50.5040804@users.sourceforge.net> List-Id: References: <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net> <530A086E.8010901@users.sourceforge.net> <530A72AA.3000601@users.sourceforge.net> <530B5FB6.6010207@users.sourceforge.net> <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net> <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <546F16A5.8030405@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Andreas Noever Cc: LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall > ring_free does not check for null: > http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c#L398 > > Maybe your software confuses the method with: > http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c#L268 Thanks for your feedback. I am sorry for a bit of confusion here. 1. Would it make sense that a variant for the thunderbolt ring_free() function will also perform input parameter validation? 2. Are any additional prefixes appropriate so that further name space conflicts can be better avoided? Regards, Markus