From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 15:42:25 +0000 Subject: Re: thunderbolt: Deletion of unnecessary checks before the function call "ring_free" Message-Id: <54720061.7010401@users.sourceforge.net> List-Id: References: <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net> <530A72AA.3000601@users.sourceforge.net> <530B5FB6.6010207@users.sourceforge.net> <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net> <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <546F16A5.8030405@users.sourceforge.net> <546F2E50.5040804@users.sourceforge.net> <1416593688.6651.39.camel@perches.com> <5471EBAC.40903@users.sourceforge.net> <1416756022.6651.45.camel@perches.com> In-Reply-To: <1416756022.6651.45.camel@perches.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: Joe Perches Cc: Andreas Noever , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tre= e/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c?id=FC14f9c1272f62c3e8d01300f52467c0d9af50= f9#n268 >=20 > I think static functions can be named whatever > the developer chooses. I agree also that this implementation detail is correct in principle. Is a renaming of such identifiers feasible so that the probability of other name clashes can be reduced and corresponding static source code analysis might become a bit easier? How do you prefer to handle name space issues? Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html