From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lino Sanfilippo Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 22:15:32 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sched: One function call less in em_meta_change() after error detection Message-Id: <54CD5404.1010004@gmx.de> List-Id: References: <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net> <530A086E.8010901@users.sourceforge.net> <530A72AA.3000601@users.sourceforge.net> <530B5FB6.6010207@users.sourceforge.net> <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net> <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <54CD042E.6030606@users.sourceforge.net> <54CD115C.8070801@gmx.de> <54CD4D91.9080801@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <54CD4D91.9080801@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: SF Markus Elfring , "David S. Miller" , Jamal Hadi Salim , netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall On 31.01.2015 22:48, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > I find that all these cases correspond to the current Linux coding > style documentation, doesn't it? > Sure, I think it does. But it was not coding style violation what I was reffering to. Regards, Lino