kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Cc: Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ding Xiang <dingxiang@cmss.chinamobile.com>,
	Coccinelle <cocci@systeme.lip6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Coccinelle: Add a SmPL script for the reconsideration of redundant dev_err() calls
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 18:48:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1906202046550.3087@hadrien> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <05d85182-7ec3-8fc1-4bcd-fd2528de3a40@web.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2467 bytes --]



On Thu, 20 Jun 2019, Markus Elfring wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 19:12:53 +0200
>
> The function “devm_ioremap_resource” contains appropriate error reporting.
> Thus it can be questionable to present another error message
> at other places.
>
> Provide design options for the adjustment of affected source code
> by the means of the semantic patch language (Coccinelle software).
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  .../coccinelle/misc/redundant_dev_err.cocci   | 53 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 scripts/coccinelle/misc/redundant_dev_err.cocci
>
> diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/redundant_dev_err.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/redundant_dev_err.cocci
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..aeb228280276
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/redundant_dev_err.cocci
> @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/// Reconsider a function call for redundant error reporting.
> +//
> +// Keywords: dev_err redundant device error messages
> +// Confidence: Medium
> +
> +virtual patch
> +virtual context
> +virtual org
> +virtual report
> +
> +@display depends on context@
> +expression e;
> +@@
> + e = devm_ioremap_resource(...);
> + if (IS_ERR(e))
> + {
> +*   dev_err(...);
> +    return (...);
> + }

Why do you assume that there is exactly one dev_err and one return after
the test?

> +
> +@deletion depends on patch@
> +expression e;
> +@@
> + e = devm_ioremap_resource(...);
> + if (IS_ERR(e))
> +-{
> +-   dev_err(...);
> +    return (...);
> +-}
> +
> +@or depends on org || report@
> +expression e;
> +position p;
> +@@
> + e = devm_ioremap_resource(...);
> + if (IS_ERR(e))
> + {
> +    dev_err@p(...);
> +    return (...);
> + }
> +
> +@script:python to_do depends on org@
> +p << or.p;
> +@@
> +coccilib.org.print_todo(p[0],
> +                        "WARNING: An error message is probably not needed here because the previously called function contains appropriate error reporting.")

"the previously called function" would be better as
"devm_ioremap_resource".

julia

> +
> +@script:python reporting depends on report@
> +p << or.p;
> +@@
> +coccilib.report.print_report(p[0],
> +                             "WARNING: An error message is probably not needed here because the previously called function contains appropriate error reporting.")
> --
> 2.22.0
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-20 18:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-20 17:30 [PATCH] Coccinelle: Add a SmPL script for the reconsideration of redundant dev_err() calls Markus Elfring
2019-06-20 18:48 ` Julia Lawall [this message]
2019-06-20 19:02   ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-20 19:02   ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-20 19:12     ` Julia Lawall
2019-06-20 19:34       ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-21  9:15       ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-21  9:21         ` Julia Lawall
2019-06-21  9:37           ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-21  9:37           ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-21 14:52             ` Julia Lawall
2019-07-01  8:10 ` [PATCH v2] " Markus Elfring
2019-07-01 10:48   ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2019-07-01 12:40     ` [v2] Coccinelle: Suppression of warnings? Markus Elfring
2019-07-01 12:47     ` [PATCH v2] Coccinelle: Add a SmPL script for the reconsideration of redundant dev_err() calls Julia Lawall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.1906202046550.3087@hadrien \
    --to=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
    --cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
    --cc=dingxiang@cmss.chinamobile.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
    --cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).